Talk:Inmate telephone system

Article moved from Inmate telephone systems to Inmate Calling Service (ICS)

The FCC use Inmate Calling Service (ICS) in their report.

References

I would like to move the article (change the name) from Inmate telephone systems to Inmate Calling Service.Oceanflynn (talk) 05:20, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Inmate telephone system. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080302071329/http://www.atis.org/tg2k/ to http://www.atis.org/tg2k/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:40, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

this is a phone call f

This is a phone call from Cedric County Jail please press one to speak to inmate 2600:8803:750F:E00:D811:493F:4969:12C8 (talk) 04:52, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Capstone - Criminal Justice Reform

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 5 September 2024 and 10 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Arisgin (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Arisgin (talk) 15:09, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

@Arisgin: I've come across this article and I'm confused by your contributions. I understand you may be new and on an an assignment:

• In this edit, you introduced a source that appears entirely unrelated to the subject, where picking https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1 seems just bogus.
• In this subsequent one, you kind of parroted Securus Technologies's about page, in a way that I would say is clearly not encyclopedic as it reads like an ad for the company.
• In this later one, you removed substantial portions of seemingly fine and properly source content, without any explanation whatsoever (maybe you had a good reason that I can't see, but edit summaries are important!).

Please let me know what you think of this feedback, as I don't want to discourage you from contributing or fulfilling your assignment, but I am indeed perplexed by the above, and Wikipedia is not just a place where you can experiment at will with things like removing substantial sourced content or summarizing a marketing page, at least not in article space.

LjL (talk) 04:53, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

The source is listed actually was not a source i contributed to the page. Maybe the way i cited it navigated you a different cite but that was not one of my sources of information. As far as the Securus technologies part of it, I can understand the way i worded it that it may sound like an ad and I could have maybe wrote differently, however i think under the sections of "providers" it is essential to add some of those things in there to bring knowledge of what these providers offer rather than statistics and money signs and people that personally people who want to know more about the inmate system do not really care about. Arisgin (talk) 16:36, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

I don't understand, in the edit where I thogught you added an unrelated source, the edit summary literally says "cited source", and the diff shows you adding that citation. If I look at the previous revision of the page, that "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1" doesn't appear anywhere. So if I made a mistake in thinking you added it, I apologize; sometimes edit history does get confusing. But I still can't understand how I made that mistake... can you point out where that same source was in a prior revision to your edit?

As to the Securus technologies part, keep in mind it does already have its own well-cited article. There might be things that make sense to add within this article, but with what you added specifically, I am feeling fairly confident it wouldn't pass most Wikipedians' smell test: it's not just about how you worded it, but if you simply cite Securus and basically reword what they say about themselves, that's not an independent sources, in fact there's such a conflict of interest in themselves talking about themselves positively that I don't think it can be considered acceptable, even though primary sources like that in general can be acceptable in Wikipedia articles when used sparingly and with care. But, really, not their own marketing twist of how good they are... LjL (talk) 18:25, 25 November 2024 (UTC)