Talk:Inkwell Awards

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by United States comics work group.

Multiple issues

I've gone through and done my best to address the severe WP:TONE and WP:PEACOCK issues that made this read like a company brochure, but the overall tone of this article is still self-promotional. The vast majority of the links are all to the Inkwell website itself. Other links appear to be to personal blogs and forum pages. I would advise that no one connected to the awards edit this article — that would be a clear conflict of interest. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:54, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Full discussion

For future reference, I have imported, below, the discussion between Particletracker, the primary editor of this article that has multiple issues, and myself -- Tenebrae (talk) 03:49, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your replies. I'm not inker Bob Almond, nor anyone on the Inkwell Awards staff, but it looks like Bob has thanked me on his sites for doing the wiki-page. As a freelance writer, I've exchanged e-mails with Bob Almond regarding professional matters, and he talked to me about inking and how it has trouble getting respect in the industry, pointing out there are many more pencilers on wikipedia thank inkers. I started the Wiki pages for Bob and the Inkwell Awards out of respect for Bob and other great inkers (I'm not an inker either). I e-mailed him to tell him I wrote a Wikipedia page for him. Bob made a big thank you to me on one of his webpages, calling me his "offical chronicler" and he even put me on a list of "contributors." But I'm not hired by him or the Awards. I contributed on my own as a fan. I think I'll leave the profiles alone, and see if others continue to contribute to it.

As for notability, the awards were mentioned by Wizardworld and Sketch magazines, two reputable sources, which is more attention than a fly-by-night fan-invented award would receive.

I agree that it would be good to get more references from other sources besides its own homepage. Thanks again, and sorry for any rookie mistakes or breaches of wiki-etiquette. --Particletracker (talk) 03:17, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your taking the time and effort to discuss this today, and I'm glad you agree it's time to step back and let other editors, if any, take over contributing. As you mentioned, you're a fan of Bob Almond's efforts and he considers you his "official chronicler," so I can see how it would be difficult for you to remain neutral.

I hope you stick around, learn more of how Wikipedia is edited, with its policies and guidelines, and contribute more dispassionately to articles. The more the merrier; Wikipedia can always use new good, responsible editors. With regards, --Tenebrae (talk) 03:49, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recent (Aug '14) edits

I, Krakoom, am not involved in the Inkwell Awards. I have spoken to Mr. Almond, the founder & director, at a few shows. At Heroes (Charlotte, NC) and Pittsburgh Comicon, I have exchanged polite pleasantries and that sort of thing. I am teaching myself to be an inker, but don't get any help from professional inkers. I decided to update this page because I have friends who have attended the awards show at HeroesCon in Charlotte. — Preceding undated comment added 03:00, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Inkwell Awards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080226090416/http://www.cbgxtra.com:80/Default.aspx?tabid=42&view=topic&forumid=17&postid=41693 to http://www.cbgxtra.com/Default.aspx?tabid=42&view=topic&forumid=17&postid=41693

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:19, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Inkwell Awards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:31, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question(s)

I was wondering something after reading articles on the Inkwell Awards website. They have a spokesmodel called Ms Inkwell. It was originally a logo that now has actual models portraying her. I thought at first it was only a booth babe. After talking to one on Facebook, it seems the Ms Inkwell also handles auctions, awards ceremonies, and helps gather donations for the Inkwell Awards.

Could I add a page about Ms Inkwell? I'm not sure about the policies regarding that.

Question re Staff section

It seems like this page is trying to function almost like the organization’s website. The text in the Staff section should be shortened to something like: “Past staff members have included ….” Not sure Wikipedia is the place for the revolving list of staff members—that’s more for the org’s own website to maintain, imo. Thoughts OkieMFA (talk) 07:17, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, I removed it. It's just not notable, half the stuff on this page looks like press releases. Why is there an entire paragraph for a company "spokesmodel"? An unpaid volunteer position, of no notability except on this page. Nothing on this page makes any sense MayCauseDrowsiness (talk) 20:52, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]