Talk:Influenza A virus subtype H2N2

Viruses High‑importance

	Viruses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Asia Low‑importance

	Asia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russian flu...

...needs its own article. Bsimmons666 (talk) 23:00, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Extinct?

This article does not really make it clear.. is H2N2 Extinct? or is just the asian flu strain of it extinct? When was the last case of a person with h2n2? these are some of the questions that need more clear answers. -Tracer9999 (talk) 22:20, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Puzzling changes

@NessieVL: Thank you for reverting the changes to the article which were shown in the history as being made by me.[1] I find them puzzling too. I moved the diagram to the end of the section "Asian flu" and placed a {{clear}} so the heading of "test kits" came under it. However, the other changes I did not make but they were clearly intentional by someone. I suspect some sort of edit conflict but I certainly wasn't aware of being informed about one. I'll leave the article well alone now! Thincat (talk) 07:52, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have worked out my mistake. Before moving the diagram I had looked to see where it had been moved before, finding this. I had then edited the old version rather than the current one, diff. It was right to have reverted my edit. Apologies. Thincat (talk) 14:26, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Thincat: nbd. You had some actual decent changes in there, that's why i was puzzled. But that's why we have the edit history. Keep on trucking. --Nessie (📥) 18:25, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]