Talk:Industrial organization

industrial engineering = industrial management

According to http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/industrial+management?r=66 industrial engineering is a synonym of industrial management, so the redirect industrial management to industrial organization is apparently erroneous. --Espoo (talk) 23:05, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Content

This article is a mess overall. The Structure, conduct, performance section reads like somebody copy-pasted an essay from the internet, and the rest is just a big link hub. I might try to take a crack at rewriting it myself, but it'd be great if there was someone else to take some of the slack. I'm going to at least clean it up a little in the meantime. WeakTrain (talk) 03:00, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Industrial organization. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:09, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on Industrial organization. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:37, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Gibbs's comment on this article

Dr. Gibbs has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:

Sentence "A second approach uses ..." emphasizes internal firm organization. However, it is probably the case that there is even greater emphasis on market structures (perhaps that is what is meant by "market strategy"?). Suggest elaborating what "market strategy" means ... determinants & effects of different industry structures: perfect competition, monopoly, etc.
Under "Areas of Study" bullet points, suggest adding: regulation; regulatory capture; political economy; law & economics; antitrust; collusion; price fixing.
Suggest noting relevant Nobel prizes; e.g., Tirole, Williamson, Coase, Stigler.
Other journals you might list: J. Law & Economics; RAND J. Economics; J. Economics & Management Strategy.

We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.

Dr. Gibbs has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:

Reference : Smeets, Valerie & Ierulli, Kathryn & Gibbs, Michael, 2006. "Mergers of Equals & Unequals," Working Papers 06-8, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Economics.

ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 13:05, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tone in lead

The following paragraphs from the lead are borderline tone for Wikipedia:

The subject has a theoretical side and a practical side. According to one textbook: "On one plane the field is abstract, a set of analytical concepts about competition and monopoly. On a second plane the topic is about real markets, teeming with the excitement and drama of struggles among real firms" (Shepherd, W.; 1985; 1).

Assessments of the subject have differed over time. The preface to a related research volume in 1972 remarked on Whither industrial organization?: "That all is not well with this in this once flourishing field is readily apparent." A response came 15 years later: "[T]oday's verdict is that industrial organization is alive and well and the queen of applied microeconomics."

I'm going to remove these passages, but I won't object if someone else wants to put them back. — MaxEnt 01:18, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Industrial economics

Industrial economic 41.191.104.87 (talk) 01:02, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]