Jump to content

Talk:Independence Pass (Colorado)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleIndependence Pass (Colorado) has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 13, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
January 6, 2013Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 3, 2012.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that at 12,095 feet (3,687 m) in elevation, Colorado's Independence Pass (pictured) is the highest paved crossing of the Continental Divide in the United States?
Current status: Good article

Elevation doesn't match sign

[edit]

Yes, but it's still correct. Most Colorado elevations are a few feet higher with the current NAVD 88 model compared to the old NGVD 29 model. --Footwarrior (talk) 22:17, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Independence Pass (Colorado)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tea with toast (talk · contribs) 23:55, 17 December 2012 (UTC) I plan to review this article bit by bit over the next week. --Tea with toast (話) 23:55, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


I apologize for the delay in completing this review. I didn't have as much time as I had anticipated over the holiday break. --Tea with toast (話) 00:01, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    I can see an impressive amount of research went into writing this article. I appreciate the depth of content in the article.
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
    Nice images, and appropriately placed too.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Well done!
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Independence Pass (Colorado). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:44, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]