Talk:Imprudence (Maupassant short story)

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 12 July 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 00:44, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Imprudence (Maupassant short story) → Imprudence – revert bold move - no other WP topic of this name – Dohn joe (talk) 22:28, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:42, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dohn joe: "Imprudence" without disambiguation means the condition of being imprudent. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:42, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Again WP:DISAMBIGUATION is by TOPIC NOT TITLE. Imprudence should redirect to Prudence which naturally covers the topic of imprudence. In ictu oculi (talk) 04:03, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Unnecessary disambiguation at it's finest. Calidum T|C 04:51, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah well, you don't agree with guideline, same as every RM. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:26, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose "imprudence" should redirect to prudence as {{R from antonym}} with a hatnote back to this article, since the opposite of prudence is covered in that article, and is the primary topic. -- 67.70.32.20 (talk) 06:54, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose; I agree with the above that imprudence should redirect to Prudence. bd2412 T 15:55, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.