Talk:Immigration equality

Untitled comments

Does anyone have any information proving the claim that as of 2009 Japan offers immigration equality? I'm pretty aware of Japanese immigration law, and there is no way for a Japanese national who's gay to help with the immigration of a same-sex partner that I know of. Unless someone has some sort of source for this information I think it should be removed. Threemadness (talk) 03:13, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on Immigration equality

Cyberbot II has detected links on Immigration equality which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.change.org/ideas/view/equal_immigration_rights_for_same_sex_binational_couples
Triggered by \bchange\.org\b on the local blacklist
http://www.change.org/ideas/actions/equal_immigration_rights_for_same_sex_binational_couplesweekly
Triggered by \bchange\.org\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:44, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on Immigration equality

Cyberbot II has detected links on Immigration equality which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.change.org/ideas/actions/equal_immigration_rights_for_same_sex_binational_couplesweekly
Triggered by \bchange\.org\b on the local blacklist
http://www.change.org/ideas/view/equal_immigration_rights_for_same_sex_binational_couples
Triggered by \bchange\.org\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:40, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Immigration equality. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:41, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Immigration equality. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131110222501/http://www.glen.ie/ to http://www.glen.ie/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:09, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

LGBT (same sex) immigration and Japan

Japan is coloured blue on the map for immigration equality but the reality is somewhat different.

non-Japanese couples (both people non-Japanese) can get a visa for the partner but it is more restrictive than the one issued to hetersoexual spouses. Recently, rules have changed where one of the pair is Japanese but again the visa issued is more restrictive than the one issued to heterosexual spouses.

Additionally, neither of these policies are written into law. They are just policies of the MOJ (Ministry of Justice)

I think we should have a 3rd or stripe colour for this situation. Thoughts?

Paullb (talk) 08:41, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think Japan should just be removed ImStevan (talk) 11:05, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]