This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dua Lipa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dua Lipa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Dua LipaWikipedia:WikiProject Dua LipaTemplate:WikiProject Dua LipaDua Lipa
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move reviewafter discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Well yes if the Aespa song is deleted again we can withdraw/revert this but otherwise given it appears to have more sources and too soon was cited in the AFD it looks fine now but I don't know much about the notability of songs. Crouch, Swale (talk) 10:24, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The pageviews linked in the above comment show 94% of readers landing on this song, which is more than enough to indicate a primary topic. The Aespa song could be added directly to the hatnote for the minority. Station1 (talk) 06:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, WP:RECENTISM, which is just an essay, has to do with the content of articles, not titles: "Recentism is a phenomenon on Wikipedia where an article has an inflated or imbalanced focus on recent events." Assuming you mean the Dua Lipa article is just too recent, I would agree if it was a week or even a month old, but it's been around since April, has always gotten well over 90% of pageviews, and shows no signs of any significant decline in that number for the foreseeable future. Station1 (talk) 06:22, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral – this is getting around 17:1 pageviews compared to the other song with an article, which for me would enough for a PDAB on its own. However, given the numerous songs at Illusion (disambiguation)#Songs, some of which are on album articles which get more pageviews than the Dua Lipa song, the argument is a lot closer. I don't feel like there's enough here for me to go either way. Skarmory(talk •contribs)14:11, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
