Talk:Worldwide Aeros Corp

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

California: Los Angeles / Southern California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by Southern California task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in California may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Proposed merge (2014)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

I propose that aeroscraft be merged into this article, since the term is one seemingly coined by this company for some of their designs.TheLongTone (talk) 12:42, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. There is not enough notable subject matter to sustain separate articles, this is just another wannabee airship company with all plans and no product. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 14:20, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

They seem to have a product: it seems they have done some tether trials but there seems to have been a setback caused by their shed collapsing on the thing (!).TheLongTone (talk) 14:24, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

and they do seem to have sold a fair number of advertising "blimps" and the Pentagon gave them $3 million to do preliminary design work. [1]

All the more reason to merge, then. They have a good few products, some are production models, and much of their technology applies across more than one product. "Aeroscraft" is just a trade name for their rigids and to date a half-scale prototype has been made - not really enough for its own article. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 16:44, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That was the reason for the merge proposal- it's their name for their breed of airship rather than being a generic term.TheLongTone (talk) 17:10, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge - not familiar with the project criteria of WP Aviation, but from a general notability standpoint seems to belong inside the company article, see also Talk:Igor pasternak. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:37, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We have a 3:0 majority here for the merge. Not a huge turnout, but I think enough to take this forward. Do we need to merge histories and complicated stuff? I don't know how to do that. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 10:30, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you know what you want to merge, the process is here Wikipedia:MERGETEXT. All the steps are laid out with the appropriate edit summaries and content for talk pages ready to copy and use. I have done it at least once, and I don't remember it being onerous. GraemeLeggett (talk) 10:48, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, there have been no howls of protest. I was giving the link to the help page but GraemeLeggett got there first!TheLongTone (talk) 10:53, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 11:51, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Dragon Dream

Came across the rather short article for Dragon Dream, the prototype constructed under Project Penguin. As this is a functional aircraft, I kind of assume it is OK to have its own article. But at present the article is so short it could easily be merged in here. Are we happy to leave it where it is? — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 17:02, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Worldwide Aeros Corp. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:40, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]