Talk:Identity cleansing

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Discrimination Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Human rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kosovo High‑importance

	Identity cleansing is part of WikiProject Kosovo, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Kosovo on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.KosovoWikipedia:WikiProject KosovoTemplate:WikiProject KosovoKosovo articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Serbia Low‑importance

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Albania High‑importance

	Identity cleansing is part of the WikiProject Albania, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Albania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.AlbaniaWikipedia:WikiProject AlbaniaTemplate:WikiProject AlbaniaAlbania articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

"Apparently the idea behind this was the fact that most of the ethnic Albanians spoke only Albanian as opposed to Serbo-Croatian, and if they attempted to return to Kosovo in the future the Serbian authorities could claim that those doing so were actually Albanian nationals and not Kosovars, with the latter status conferring citizenship in what was then still known as the Republic of Yugoslavia, and thus a right of abode therein."

"Most Albanians spoke only Albanian...", yes, trouth, Albanians (from Albania) didn´t knew to speak Serbian, but for the Kosovar Albanians (what I supose was meant to say), that statement is simply unthrue.

"and if they attempted to return to Kosovo in the future the Serbian authorities could claim that ..." if, could, isn´t this speculation, thus, non-encyclopedic? Is this all the EVIDENCE? FkpCascais (talk) 00:38, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article is so POV that it is pointles to rewrite it. Also, it's subject can be mentioned somewhere, but that is also questionable. --Tadija (talk) 15:33, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POV tag

An editor who adds a POV tag to an article needs to explain on the article's talk page the issues behind the tag's insertion, pointing to specific issues or problems. --Mladifilozof (talk) 00:28, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POV tag

It seems to me that Mladifilozof on purpose left the most crucial word of the definiton with whom he starts the article. Original definiton says "Identity cleansing is a term used to denote a strategy allegedly[1] employed by the government of Serbia during the Kosovo crisis of the late 1990s." but contributor chooses to left the word allegedly and to create another meaning of the whole article. His quotaion was "Identity cleansing is a term used to denote a strategy employed by the government of Serbia during the Kosovo crisis of the late 1990s" so his intention was to show that "Identity cleansing" is a fact. But it seems to me that this whole article is a pure propaganda fabrication, based on few hearsay incidents that some journalists used in their books without any serious reference in scientific circles. So i am putting POW tag beacuse it seems to me that contributor is biased for some reason and he is not pursuing the truth, neutral point of view and he is trying do distort the truth and reality. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shanticm (talk • contribs) 03:06, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That book copies old versions of articles from Wikipedia, hence the [WP] tag next to every paragraph of the book and wikipedia can't be used as a source for itself.--— ZjarriRrethues — ^talk 13:50, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I do not quite understand what you said, but i will try to...book does not copies Wikipedia it is vice versa, book was used as a source for Wikipedia article. This is version of 2004 article^[1] with word allegedly in it so why removing it. I changed the words according the text in the book b. I explained it why in upper part of this discussion. If you want to delete reference it is ok with me because i wanted to point out disparancies. But the word allegedly have to stay. As i mentioned it above. Shanticm (talk) 19:47, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree with Shanticm on this. The word "allegedly" ia important here, and it should be included. We all know it is not the first time Mladifilozof purposly missinterprets sources... FkpCascais (talk) 20:01, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That book is a book that copies wikipedia articles Shanticm and because of that the [WP]=wikipedia is used next to all its entries. Because of that it can't be used as a source.--— ZjarriRrethues — ^talk 20:12, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the source cited is WP, so not acceptable. Sorry, I touth a "real" source was used. FkpCascais (talk) 20:17, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad we agree FkpCascais. If a reliable source is found please add it without hessitation.--— ZjarriRrethues — ^talk 20:47, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

but this article notes the book as it source??? so what came first the article of the book??? than this whole article is to be deleted because its source did not exists because book took it from wikipedia and wikipedia article is written based on the book??? this is contradiction...you are deleting a word allegedly based on the source but you keep previous version based on the same citation??? how do you call that??? so you delete whole sentence because it is taken from the book, or leave it be...ref number 2 is same reference next to the word allegedly...and you do not have problems with that Shanticm (talk) 07:52, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the whole citation from the book as — ZjarriRrethues — suggested that source cited is WP... Shanticm (talk) 07:56, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php? title=Identity_cleansing&diff=354589294&oldid=7845667

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Identity cleansing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060923021126/http://belgrade.usembassy.gov/policy/regional/030331.html to http://belgrade.usembassy.gov/policy/regional/030331.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:10, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Identity cleansing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110522100942/http://www.ess.uwe.ac.uk/Kosovo/Reports/document.html to http://www.ess.uwe.ac.uk/kosovo/reports/document.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:33, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php? title=Identity_cleansing&diff=354589294&oldid=7845667

[1]