Talk:Ice Cream Freeze (Let's Chill)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ice Cream Freeze (Let's Chill) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Ice Cream Freeze (Let's Chill) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 27, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Disney Low‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Miley Cyrus Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Miley Cyrus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Miley Cyrus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Miley CyrusWikipedia:WikiProject Miley CyrusTemplate:WikiProject Miley CyrusMiley Cyrus articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Merging

This article should NOT be merged to Hannah Montana 3 per WP:NSONGS. The song has charted on a national chart and there is definitely enough sourced information to warrant a detailed article that is not a stub.--Rockin56 (talk) 18:07, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Citation number 4

Hey, I cannot seem to fix citation number 4. The format is correct yet it appears as it should not. If you can fix it, please do so. Thank you. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 19:50, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I resolved the issue, nevermind. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 19:50, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Extended play

Before, the article stated an extended play for the song was released in the iTunes Store. It included details such as its release date, September 5, 2009, and the tracks featured. However, none of this had a source and I scavenged through iTunes for the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom and could not find such release. If you find a source please feel free to leave the URL here and I'll add it to the article, if you want. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 20:05, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ice Cream Freeze (Let's Chill)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 17:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
In the Background section, "'Ice Cream Freeze (Let's Chill}' has a corresponding dance moves designed by Jamal Sims", this sentence doesn't make sense. Do you mean ---> "'Ice Cream Freeze (Let's Chill)' has corresponding dance moves designed by Jamal Sims" or something like that?
Check.

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
In the lead and throughout the article, example "It was released on June 30, 2009 by Walt Disney Records as a promotional single" commas after dates, if using MDY. In the Background section, "'Ice Cream Freeze (Let's Chill}'" ---> "'Ice Cream Freeze (Let's Chill)'".
I don't understand the first part about the commas. As for the title, it is fixed. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 05:15, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I got it and check.
Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
Reference 3 has a different url link path, so you might want to update that.
I don't understand. I clicked the link and it sends me to the page directly. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 05:17, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It does send you to the page, but the url link has changed, and check.

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

C. It contains no original research:

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Not that much to do. If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!

-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 17:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you to Ipodnano for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:10, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ice Cream Freeze (Let's Chill). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091028060905/http://disneymusic.disney.go.com/albums/hannahmontana3karaoke.html to http://disneymusic.disney.go.com/albums/hannahmontana3karaoke.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:57, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]