Talk:ITunes LP

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Apple Inc. Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Albums Listed

I'm removing the list of albums on this page. Listing every album available is absurd. OlYeller^Talktome 21:43, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm inclined to agree. However, this article is still the best (only?) way to find iTunes LPs. Do you think a Wikipedia category for these would be more appropriate? --Evil Eccentric (talk) 01:16, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2011 update

I agree, and have restored the article in agreement with the above consensus. Turning this article into a directory listing every iTunes LP is unencyclopedic. Drmies (talk) 17:41, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See, for instance, WP:NOTDIR. This article was been turned into a list which has as little validity as List of CDs. It was pointed out by one editor that the list is useful, but that is not a valid reason for keeping it the way it was. Drmies (talk) 17:57, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I still think the article shouldn't include the list. Is there even a reliable source to back up the list? If so, it would probably be more beneficial to include it as an external link. Creating a category would also be useful. OlYeller^Talktome 18:58, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - This external page doesn't exist, this WIki page become the bible for all iTunes LP fans, and I know a lot of people consult it. It took me hours to update it and keep it up to date.Hooltra (talk) 19:07, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - That List of CDs (or something like it) doesn't exist as a wiki article was precisely my point. Such lists are not encyclopedic. Drmies (talk) 19:17, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - Maybe we can find a solution, but don't erase that list, it's a real source of information for a lot of people. If we create a "iTunes LP List" page, and put the link into the iTunes LP page, will you accept that ?Hooltra (talk) 19:38, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - I stand by what I said a year ago; this list is important. However, I agree it can't stay in this form. For now, I recommend a revert (put the list back), and then create an iTunes LP category or list article. After all the albums are in the category or list, we can remove the list from this page. Otherwise, this valuable information would be lost. I've used this page many times before to help me decide between the CD or the iTunes version. And Hooltra's right that (AFAIK) this is the only such list of iTunes LPs on the Internet. --Evil Eccentric (talk) 19:46, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      - But how would List of ITunes LPs be valid under our guidelines? Is there another example anywhere of such a list on Wikipedia, a list where membership is only determined by the medium? List of books? List of albums? (Note that those are redirects, and that they go to articles with lists that have specific criteria for inclusion.) Drmies (talk) 19:54, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        I know there are no such example on Wikipedia because iTunes LP is a very specific category, it's not a classical media. Do you have an idea to not lost this important source of information ? ThxHooltra (talk) 20:49, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        OlYeller has a suggestion, above. BTW, that it's a new medium has no bearing on this discussion. The category is no more special than any other. Whether this is notable as a category, I personally doubt that--but that's just me. Drmies (talk) 02:17, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        
        They also suggested, as I did, to take it up at the appropriate project, Wikipedia:WikiProject Music. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 13:31, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ituneslp-logo.jpg Nominated for Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:Ituneslp-logo.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Media without a source as of 29 June 2011 What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:32, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Split

I think iTunes Extras should be its own article because they are not the same thing, and each has a different meaning and background.--Proud User (talk) 14:51, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

".Itlp" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect .Itlp. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:50, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]