This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education
It's the overall style. Wikipedia is not the place to advertise PhD programs and attract students. There are many groups of universities that organise PhD programs together, but having a whole article on a PhD program seems excessive - especially when the style of the article sounds like an (academic-style) advertisement and there's no particular reason why an article seems to be justified.
There is no information about decision-making and transparency - academic institutions normally prioritise collegial decision-making and are increasingly moving towards greater transparency. What groups of people make the main decisions? How are they elected? Who are they elected by? Hope these help to explain. Boud (talk) 19:43, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}
