Talk:Hurricane Kyle (2008)

Hurricane Kyle (2008) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 15, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed

Weather: Tropical / Atlantic Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Atlantic hurricane work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Caribbean High‑importance

	Caribbean portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article Creation

OK, this is getting ridiculous... We seriously do NOT need an article on Kyle the second after its upgraded! The article adds absolutely nothing to Kyle's section in the 2008 Atlantic hurricane season. For real, keep this kind of stuff in the sandbox until there's enough information to make a decent article. Right now there is not even close to enough. _{|C A I N E R|}^|ninety-one| 20:42, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I get your point, but why not make the article now? It will only be made into a main article in due time. (Hurricaneguy (talk) 20:48, 25 September 2008 (UTC))[reply]

I have added a bit more... You just need to add longer and more words to it. Itfc+canes=me (talk) 20:51, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More in to it. And please don't kill me, i added a trivia section, i suggest after the storm ends we move that to a new bit. Itfc+canes=me (talk) 20:57, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK now, but when it was first published, it was only about 3 sentences long, the templates weren't filled out, and it was just generally a mess. Things like that should be completed and added before publication, in the sandbox! That's what they're there for. I guess i just don't really see the need to have an article on a trivial storm like this. In due time, when it affects NS/NE, sure, but now, not so much. My 2 cents. _{|C A I N E R|}^|ninety-one| 21:05, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did have a sandbox on this, with Preparations, Impact, and everything: User:Plasticup/TD11. Looks as though my work was copy/pasted into this article. Plasticup ^T/C 21:11, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles on storms are usually created within an hour of being designated or upgraded because they will have plenty of interest. If we wait until after it dissipates, there will be no interest in the storm, and the article will fail to develop as it should. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 21:16, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That is correct. Likewise if 94L if declared Laura (appears possible but not too likely), expect Tropical Storm Laura (2008) to appear pretty quickly as well. A sandbox is not being made there yet due to the low probability. CrazyC83 (talk) 22:05, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rainfall graphic for PR will be up Saturday

I've been sitting on the spreadsheet all day, waiting for Kyle's upgrade. I could have thrown it online at 3 pm, but that would have been really bad. hehehehe. I'm off tomorrow, or I'd have posted it in the morning. Thegreatdr (talk) 21:41, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is that 30 inch estimate I found really true? Plasticup ^T/C 22:09, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is a measurement from a USGS gage above 30 inches. Thegreatdr (talk) 23:44, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's on the page. Thegreatdr (talk) 16:25, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TRIVIA

Julian, Would an image suffice for a source? Itfc+canes=me (talk) 08:46, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Trivia sections. Plasticup ^T/C 12:50, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't the fact that it was unsourced that promted me to remove it. Trivia sections are strongly discouraged per Wikipedia:Trivia sections. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 12:54, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So how do we get it into the article? Itfc+canes=me (talk) 17:46, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Either you don't, or you incorporate it into the appropriate section(s). –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 17:51, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In some of the really old hurricane articles they used to do a forecast section about how well the NHC forecasted the storm.... when the reports out we'll do it then? Itfc+canes=me (talk) 09:34, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not necessary IMO. It could probably just be stuck somewhere in the SH. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 12:44, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Advisory Style

I really do not think there is a need to put the "New Advisory Style" in the article. It has nothing to do with the acutal storm itself. What are other opinions? (Hurricaneguy (talk) 13:07, 27 September 2008 (UTC))[reply]

I don't see the harm, although it doesn't need a whole paragraph. One sentence would suffice. Plasticup ^T/C 15:23, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It does HurricaneGuy and Plasticup if we can create a whole paragraph then it can have a paragraph. Itfc+canes=me (talk) 18:10, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Running best track

The running best track has Kyle at 85mph for 6 hours now, and the 1800Z keeps it at 85mph. NHC however, has it at 80mph. It also shows Kyle becoming a hurricane 6 hours before the operational data [1] Cyclonebiskit (talk) 18:45, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lol.... we'll have to wait for report.... also.... SSD now calling Kyle extratropical.... I suggest we prepare for a last advisory. Itfc+canes=me (talk) 19:16, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last NHC advisory. However, there are still warnings out in Canada...so at least for now I replaced the template, but kept the current section with the 11 pm data, although someone else is free to change it. CrazyC83 (talk) 02:49, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Canada hurricanes

I've added a short blurb about this hurricane in List of Canada hurricanes. Please keep it updated and remove the "current related" template after the current-event template is removed from Hurricane Kyle (2008). davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 02:17, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Why is there no image of Kyle as a hurricane? It just shows it as a tropical storm.

Find a suitable image and upload it. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 21:58, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because i'm not a Wikipedia member, I can't copy or paste images from other sources without a GDFL license. It will just be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.235.209.99 (talk) 22:34, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All images need a license, no matter who uploads it. But if you find a good one, I can upload it for you. Just give me the link. Plasticup ^T/C

Never mind. Someone put an image of Kyle as a hurricane on the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.235.204.64 (talk) 22:46, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle's early life

I'm changing the top of the storm history from its currently errant wording. It states Kyle did not have a closed wind circulation near Puerto Rico, which is incorrect. NHC statements indicated merely it was not well-defined enough to be a tropical cyclone at that time. Thegreatdr (talk) 15:30, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rated Hurricane Kyle as a C-Class Article

I rated Hurricane Kyle as a C-Class article because it does seem to have some form of completion. Does anyone else agree with this statement? (Hurricaneguy (talk) 20:42, 2 October 2008 (UTC))[reply]

I think it should remain at Start-Class, as the impact section is incomplete. The article needs some general work, including formatting the references, as well. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 20:45, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't Julian... sorry.. ITFC+CANES=ME T31K 19:02, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's at least C class. Thegreatdr (talk) 19:14, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree totally. The impact section is incomplete, and the met. history is really lacking. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:31, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since September, assessment issues have been coming up frequently within the project, leading to sock puppetry and people leaving the project. Here are the C class criteria, in case there needs to be a refresher:

The article is substantial, but is still missing important content or contains a lot of irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant issues or require substantial cleanup. The article is better developed in style, structure and quality than Start-Class, but fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements; need editing for clarity, balance or flow; or contain policy violations such as bias or original research. Articles on fictional topics are likely to be marked as C-Class if they are written from an in-universe perspective.

How does this article fail the given C class criteria? So far, we have a 3-2 vote supporting C class. Thegreatdr (talk) 13:32, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, after looking at the Start-class criteria, I agree this article is C-class. Sorry for the drama. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:35, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Kyle (2008). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nlmoc.navy.mil/cgi-bin/viewtext.pl?File=/center/Tropical/wtnt01

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:00, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Kyle (2008). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5a1zWeTTp?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww4.ncdc.noaa.gov%2Fcgi-win%2Fwwcgi.dll%3Fwwevent%7Estorms to http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-win/wwcgi.dll?wwevent%7Estorms

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:41, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hurricane Kyle (2008). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nlmoc.navy.mil/cgi-bin/viewtext.pl?File=%2Fcenter%2FTropical%2Fwtnt01
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070808041105/http://www.weather.bm/climatereport/climateReport.asp to http://www.weather.bm/climatereport/climateReport.asp
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-win/wwcgi.dll?wwevent~storms

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:49, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Hurricane Kyle (2008). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:39, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]