Jump to content

Talk:Hurricane Hernan (2002)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleHurricane Hernan (2002) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 9, 2008Good article nomineeListed
September 23, 2008Featured topic candidatePromoted
January 4, 2009Featured article candidateNot promoted
August 17, 2024Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 23, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Hurricane Hernan was the second of three Category 5 Pacific hurricanes in the 2002 hurricane season?
Current status: Good article

Todo

[edit]

This is a solid start-class article. It needs a little more to be B-class: Some more info about records/Cat 5ness/impact if any is available, as well as a longer lead that includes something about impact/naming section. All in all not far from B-class. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 00:02, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It appears to still be a work in progress. Struck through until it is "finished" so a fair todoing can be given. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 00:09, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I thought I was done, but I was busy addressing the issues you have pointed out. I added a tad about the records and statistics, so just check back every so often to see how it is coming along. Thanks. Juliancolton The storm still blows... 00:12, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I added some records and statistics and what impact I could find. Does it need anything else? Juliancolton The storm still blows... 00:55, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's close to B-class. Dates (of the source's creation if available, not the day the reference was accessed) should be added to web/news references (like this: date=yyyy-mm-dd), and make sure that all instances of category (in the context of the SSHS) are capialized, as well as measurements having nbsp's. It could also use somewhat of a copyedit. I'm going to ask for a second opinion. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 01:14, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Juliancolton The storm still blows... 01:18, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I was originally working on a Hernan article. Seeing as you did it before me, I guess I can offer some of the sources I had saved for my article. First, Hernan's remnants were responsible for showers in California that caused slippery roads as per [1], but original predictions had it causing storms, winds, cooling temperatures, and scattered cloudiness per [2]. Finally (here's something you could use for DYK), when Hernan rapidly intensified from named storm to Cat 5, its rate was 1.73 mbar per hour, just under the threshhold for what is considered "rapid intensification", but for a 12 hour period from the 31st to Sept. 1st, it deepened at a rate of 2.58 mbar; within range of "explosive deepening". Source for that is [3] and for the ranges of RI and ED, you can use the glossary of terms on NHC's site here [4]. (EDIT: Didn't know it was already proposed for DYK. It's ok then. Also, if you wish to use it, I have a TRMM image of Hernan on Commons you can use in the article. It's this one.‎) Hurricane Angel Saki My own personal NHC 03:41, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, those really help. I will add those when I get the chance. Juliancolton The storm still blows... 19:17, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(indent reset) I added the picture. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 01:54, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Also, I have been copyediting it somewhat, so it should be better writing-wise. Juliancolton The storm still blows... 21:25, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Good article nomination on hold

[edit]

This article's Good Article promotion has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write. This is how the article, as of March 9, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Pass
2. Factually accurate?: References in the lead section, almost everyone forgets those
3. Broad in coverage?: Effects on shipping?
4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
5. Article stability? Pass
6. Images?: Pass, nice images


Overall great article, just needs refs in the lead section, and needs to mention any effects on shipping.

Please address these matters soon and then leave a note here showing how they have been resolved. After 48 hours the article should be reviewed again. If these issues are not addressed within 7 days, the article may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work so far. Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 21:32, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Successful good article nomination

[edit]

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of March 9, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Pass
2. Factually accurate?: Pass
3. Broad in coverage?: Pass
4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
5. Article stability? Pass
6. Images?: Pass, wonderful

Great job, and man you are quick! If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 21:40, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HURDAT

[edit]

Hernan and Hurricane Elida tied for second place behind Hurricane Kenna in the list of most intense storms of the 2002 Pacific hurricane season. Hernan's time as a Category 5 hurricane, 12 hours, was second to Kenna's.[1] Hernan was one of three Category 5 hurricanes in the 2002 Pacific hurricane season.[1]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Hurricane Hernan (2002). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:08, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Hernan (2002). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:08, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference hurdat was invoked but never defined (see the help page).