Jump to content

Talk:Hurricane Grace

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Citation Titles

[edit]

I recently noticed some citations in their article are titled “Tropical Storm GRACE” or any variant of that name (for example: Tropical Depression GRACE). When citing NHC issued advisories, please always use the 4th line of the article as the title (for example, let’s say that you are citing the first advisory of of Hurricane Grace. The proper title of that is “Potential Tropical Cyclone Seven Advisory Number 1”.). This rule is also used for discussions, forecast discussions, and wind speed Probabilities. Thank you. Kayree kh (talk) 10:57, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've had to correct that before. I think it's because some people are autofilling parameters from the URL, which often gives incorrect results. TornadoLGS (talk) 16:42, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Which image to use

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was the second image.

Image 1 Image 2 Image 3

There is an ongoing edit war for which image to use. Since we can't agree on one of these three, let's agree. 🌀AwesomeHurricaneBoss🌀 11:37, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
  • @AwesomeHurricaneBoss and Hurricaneboy23: Please stop reverting each other and just present your reasonings, as it is really pathetic that you are reverting over images taken an hour and a half apart. This is especially true when you stop and consider that most tropical cyclones that have ever existed do not have the luxury of an image to pick from every 5 minutes yet alone every hour.Jason Rees (talk) 21:58, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sick of these image edit wars. Any more reverting from either of you and I'm taking this article to RFPP. TornadoLGS (talk) 22:13, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another edit war

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Edit war resolved between the parties, with the consensus in favor of Image 4 after Supportstorm tweaked it. No need to keep this open any further. I was involved, but I struck my !vote. Destroyer (Alternate account) 19:56, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image 1 Image 2 Image 3 Image 4

*I prefer Image 4 as it was closer to peak intensity (110 kt vs 105 kt Image 3). And also, enough of these image wars. We're not having a repeat of Delta 2020. Destroyer (Alternate account) 19:15, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plus, Image 3 looks better as image 4 looks ragged so I prefer Image 3 Hurricane4235 (talk) 07:34, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Hurricaneboy23: pinging Hurricaneboy23 HurricaneEdgar 13:41, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • You did not need to ping me here another 2 times, I got the message the first time. Since Supportstorm has improved the image, I am in support of Image 4 which is closer to peak intensity than all the images (all of them are either when grace was 115/120 mph) and is the most realistic looking. It is also consistent with the nighttime image of Hurricane Nicholas, and I like consistency. Also, @AwesomeHurricaneBoss:, I suggest you quit reverting images with little to no reasoning (you did not even give much real reasoning to why you started this discussion in rhe first place... besides that there was an edit war ongoing due to you not giving valid reasoning!!!). WP:IDONTLIKEIT is not a valid excuse. Hurricaneboy23 (page) * (talk) 14:38, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Need to remind you that you were just as complicit in this edit war, which seems to be a ongoing trend. The next instance of either one of you being involved in another image edit war will be reported to WP:AN/3. There have been numerous warnings posted in the past for similar behavior, please correct this. Supportstorm (talk) 16:56, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the cleanup of image 4. I am now supportive of all images except 2, still 3 preference. 🌀AwesomeHurricaneBoss🌀 17:11, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

TCR

[edit]

The tropical cyclone report reduces the wind speed to 120mph, which means that the storm no longer ties Karl for the highest winds in the Bay of Campeche. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.26.29.150 (talk) 14:13, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]