Jump to content

Talk:Hurricane Fernanda (1993)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleHurricane Fernanda (1993) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 21, 2010Good article nomineeListed

Untitled

[edit]

At least a "C" in my opinion, probably higher. --Dil Hoom Hoom Kare 19:37, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Fernanda (1993)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 20:58, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am reviewing this article. The only problem I find is that ref 13 (used twice in the article) is dead. Otherwise, great job! Xtzou (Talk) 20:58, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    Ref 13 (used twice) is a dead link and is not in the Internet Archive.
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused: }
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: