Talk:Hurricane Easy (1950)

Hurricane Easy (1950) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Hurricane Easy (1950) is part of the 1950 Atlantic hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 8, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
January 28, 2011	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Weather: Tropical / Atlantic Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Atlantic hurricane work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Todo

Looks good, great sources and organization. Could use some more pictures if at all possible. --Core des at talk! 00:54, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. I tried finding another pic (radar or damage), but I had no luck. The only way other picture that could possibly occur is if David Roth does a rainfall pic, though he's not in that time period yet. Hurricanehink (talk) 01:11, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect information

I removed the statement which reported that Easy "was the first hurricane to strike the Florida Keys since 1919." This is blatantly false. You cannot forget the Labor Day Hurricane of 1935, which was a direct strike upon the islands. In addition, hurricanes struck the Keys during 1945 and 1948. Look at the list of Florida hurricanes, too. The previous information directly contradicted the rest of Wikipedia's sources and articles. I just wanted to bring this fact to your attention. CapeVerdeWave (talk) 12:03, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Easy (1950)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Leave Message, Yellow Evan home 18:21, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is a very good article. Here is some comments.

Lead

"After crossing Cuba, the hurricane rapidly strengthened in the eastern Gulf of Mexico to reach peak winds of 125 mph" metric conversions.
"From the point when Hurricane Easy entered the Gulf of Mexico until it weakened to a tropical storm, it was observed nearly constantly from radars or Reconnaissance Aircraft.[1]" Now need for sources in lead if they are already mentioned in the article.

MH

"After executing its first loop, Hurricane Easy moved northeastward at 7 mph (11 km/h) until making landfall near Cedar Key on September 5 with winds of 120 mph (190 km/h)" Which category on the hurricane scale?
"Steering currents again became weak, resulting in Easy to execute a second loop in 24 hours towards the southeast."Sounds a lttle strange

Impact

Retitle section Preparations and Impact.
"Experienced the eye of the hurricane for 2 1/2 hours" It should be "experienced the eye of the hurricane for 2 and a half hours
"While looping twice along its path, the hurricane dropped heavy amounts of rainfall of 10 in (250 mm) to 20 in (510 mm) in large portions of northwestern Florida. Rainfall totals include 24.5 inches in Cedar Key in 3 days" Meric conversions would be nice
"Described as the worst hurricane in the Cedar Key area in 70 years, Hurricane Easy left half of the houses destroyed or unfit for rehabilitation, while 90% of the others were damaged.[5] The strong winds destroyed the roofs of 150 homes and buildings" Reword the first part.

References

"Barnes, Jay (2007). Florida's Hurricane History Chapel Hill Press. ISBN 0807824437." This is random. If you are used it {{cite book}} it and cite where you specifically used it.

In all, nice article. I am putting it on hold for now. Leave Message, Yellow Evan home

Fixed everything but two: I avoided the SSHS note, since the Saffir-Simpson scale wasn't made until the 1970s, and the book is used twice in the article, which has the page reference in the article. Hope that works! Hurricanehink (talk) 18:30, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I will pass the article. Nice work and Godd luck on your GT/FT. Leave Message, Yellow Evan home

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Hurricane Easy (1950)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

It'd be good to get more impact, and there are some small MoS issues, but overall, it's a B. Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 23:25, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 23:25, 17 July 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 18:31, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hurricane Easy (1950). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:32, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]