Talk:Hurricane Carol (1953)

Hurricane Carol (1953) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Hurricane Carol (1953) is part of the 1953 Atlantic hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 8, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed
March 30, 2011	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Weather: Tropical / Atlantic Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Atlantic hurricane work group (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Carol (1953)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cyclonebiskit (talk) 21:44, 8 February 2011 (UTC) Excellent article hink, it's a great read. There is one little thing with the met history (always something, right?); what was steering the storm? Obviously the track would show a really strong ridge of high pressure being the dominant factor but is there any mention of it in an article? Other than that everything is all good. I'll pass the article once you get back to me on that tidbit. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 21:44, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea, to be honest. I double-checked all of the sources I had (or in the newspapers), and I couldn't find out why. Back then, they didn't have as thorough meteorological stats as we have now. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:02, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I guess that can't be helped. Well, I'm going to pass it, nice job. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 23:06, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]