Talk:Human Diversity Foundation
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Human Diversity Foundation article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Sourcing issues
[edit]Hope not Hate is an advocacy group. I have not started a deletion discussion, and hopefully, this can be avoided, but the overall tone and detail of this article cannot be supported if this is supposed to be the overarching source. I would suggest a massive cleanup effort on multiple fronts. Biohistorian15 (talk) 20:02, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- You have admitted several times on Wikipedia to being in email contact with the founder of the Human Diversity Foundation, so you are not exactly neutral regarding this article. Has has told you to start a deletion discussion? Hope not Hate passes WP:RS and are used as a valid source on many articles on Wikipedia. There is also the fact that Channel 4 will be covering an expose on the Human Diversity Foundation which will lead to plenty more sources in next 2 weeks. This is definitely not a delete because there is good WP:RS on the topic. Psychologist Guy (talk) 20:52, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- I haven't had time to look into all the details, but it seems that a lot of the points discussed in the Hope Not Hate article are reaffirmed by the WP:SECONDARY reporting in this recent piece in The Guardian. Generalrelative (talk) 21:25, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Also see [1] published The Guardian. Psychologist Guy (talk) 16:12, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed. Doug Weller talk 16:25, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- I haven't had time to look into all the details, but it seems that a lot of the points discussed in the Hope Not Hate article are reaffirmed by the WP:SECONDARY reporting in this recent piece in The Guardian. Generalrelative (talk) 21:25, 16 October 2024 (UTC)