Talk:Hoya
Appearance
![]() | Disambiguation | |||
|
Requested move 23 September 2020
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved including the Hoya (plant) suggestion. -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:08, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
– No clear primary topic. In terms of pageviews, the genus has only 29% if you include marginal entries and still only 40% if you exclude them; in general we require a clear majority to declare a primary topic, not a plurality. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:40, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 16:03, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support per nom. No clear primary topic. Move disambiguation page to basename. Paintspot Infez (talk) 16:14, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support the singer gets nearly as many views, clearly not primary by usage. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:28, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment if the plant article is moved, the title should be Hoya (plant). "(plant)" is WP:CONSISTENTly used as a the disambiguation term when a plant genus is disambiguated against another topic. In the past, Wikipedia used "(genus)" disambiguators somewhat frequently, but that usage was never established consistently. Disambiguated articles on genera now (mostly) consistently use a disambiguator based on higher classification of the organism: "(bird)", "(insect)", "(fungus)", etc. Plantdrew (talk) 21:37, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.