Talk:Howeitat

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Howeitat article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Arab world Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Jordan Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jordan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jordan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JordanWikipedia:WikiProject JordanTemplate:WikiProject JordanJordan

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks YOU can help with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Is it Huwaytat or Howeitat?

There are several different spellings of the name in this article. 14.202.126.212 (talk) 08:23, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

20th century historian negates 16th century historian?

If the 16th century historian al-Nahrawali said that the Howeitat were in northwestern (present day) Saudi Arabia during his time, what evidence leads the 20th century historian Salibi to negate that claim? How would have al-Nahrawali have guessed that the Howeitat would somehow end up exactly where he had guessed they would, 300 years later? I understand that a 16th century historian might be incorrect about something. But this seems to be an odd sequence of events. Historian A says, "Fact B is true today," in 1550; Historian C speaks in 1950 and says, "Fact B is true today, but it only became true in 1825, regardless of Historian A having said it was true during his time." It's not impossible, or even improbable, but it calls for an explanation, which this article does not give. Was al-Nahrawali merely speculating, and got lucky? Was he anticipating an event which seemed likely to happen? What evidence is the basis of Salibi's contention that al-Nahrawali was incorrect? —catsmoke ^talk 20:19, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]