Talk:Howard Krongard

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Maryland Mid‑importance

	Maryland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MarylandWikipedia:WikiProject MarylandTemplate:WikiProject MarylandMaryland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

What is the relationship if any between former CIA executive director Buzzy (A.B.) Krongard and Howard Krongard? Jmegill 14:39, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

State IG Issue

Hi all. Just wondering if the controversy over Krongard and the corrupt contractors, etc. should be here, or on a separate article. (Given WP:BLP concerns). In my view, it seems fine to have it here now, given that there's a small amount of material that's relatively neutral. But I can imagine that if an investigation goes forward, there might be a need to create a new article and present a summary here. Thoughts? --Bfigura ^(talk) 21:13, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Two malicious editors have been at war

"Most of the allegations have been denounced – by the minority members of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and by some numbskulls at the Wall Street Journal – as pure partisan politics.[13][14]"

"Some numbskulls" is unencyclopedic language to say the least! But the original comment wasn't very helpful without more detail - just saying that some people (unnamed, but who turn out to be Krongard's political allies) denounced "most" allegations, without specifying who, which allegations, and on what grounds, is pretty irrelevant. If it can't be expanded, it should be removed - but obviously it shouldn't have been vandalized with the "numbskulls" comment either. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.184.81 (talk) 15:28, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Howard Krongard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:19, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]