Talk:Hosseiniyeh Ershad
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Motahari also taught here. Can anyone shed some light on the relationship between Shariati and Motahari. I read somewhere that they did not get along. Thanks.
Response to question posted above:
Motahhari, Shariati, Minachi, Mohammad Taqi (Shariati's father), Abolfazl Zanjani, Bahonar, Musavi-Arabili, Homayun, Manuchehr Salur, Nasser MakaremShirazi, AliAkbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani and Mohammad Beheshti taught there.Shariati was openly attacking two main pillars of the Iranian society, aimed at the clergy as the guardians of a polytheistic, pacifying, reactionary, and oppressive Islam and he lashed out at the political, economic, and cultural institutions and foundations of the shah's regime. Motahhari was feeling as though Minachi (Ershad Board of Director) and Shariati were combining forces against him and so he was feeling as though he was losing his domination over Ershad, and so he blamed the two for different reasons. Motahhari complained bout Shariati's articles (notably his book Eslamshenasi). Motahhari threatened to leave Ershad because in his view, Shariati was uncontrollable, stubborn, and impervious to council and recommendations. Also Motahhari felt he was not advised on Ershad's daily operations with regards to what should be said and who should speak. Basically a clash of personalities and egos at Ershad evolved into a string of disputes and finally terminated with the departure of Motahhari. This involved a controversy between two different Islamic discourses appealing to two different audiences. Shariati represented one interpretation (an enlightened intellectual without any formal religious training, the non traditional religious content of his speeches, his appearance, and questions about his immediate family member's practical loyalty to Islamic customs, i.e. not wearing hijab, etc). And Motahhari defending the traditional clergy.
It is interesting because Shariati did represent some of Motahhari's own ideas but in a more radical and fiery manner. Was it not Motahhari who, some nine years earlier, had argued that inflicted by populism, the Shi'i clergy were incapable of leading society, since they were always condemned to trail conservative and change resistant commoners? Had Motahhari not accused the clergy of defending the status quo and had he not pressed the religious dignitaries to take action and reform the cleric institution, rowhaniyat, lest all would be lost to 'those newly born shrines'?
Source: Ali Rahnema (An Islamic Utopian, A political biography of Ali Shariati. (2000) I.B. TAURIS, p. 248-259). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.80.97.19 (talk) 03:32, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
Extra Details
[edit]Such as when was it built? 92.20.10.252 (talk) 14:49, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hosseiniyeh Ershad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110701000257/http://www.opendemocracy.net/article/iran-a-blind-leap-of-faith to http://www.opendemocracy.net/article/iran-a-blind-leap-of-faith
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:17, 7 November 2017 (UTC)