Talk:Honey, I Shrunk the Kids

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disney Mid‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animation: Stop motion Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Stop motion work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Focus

It appears to me that there is a significantly unnecessary focus on the sequels/attractions, and not enough focus relating to the sole "Honey, I Shrunk the Kids". I don't find a problem in mentioning the sequels and attractions, but who played this person in a sequel who ended up on "Smallville" or "That 70's Show", etc. is probably not necessary. Again, don't get the idea that I don't want the related shows mentioned, but save detailed descriptions of them for their own pages.71.199.25.62 21:47, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shrank

Should the article mention that the grammar is incorrect —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.108.232.88 (talk) 02:13, 7 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

No, because it's not incorrect. - furrykef (Talk at me) 02:20, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dictionaries are not authorities on grammar, they merely reflect how people speak in practice. In theory, you don't say "I shrunk" you say "I shrank." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.21.221 (talk) 19:47, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will shrink. I shrank. I have shrunk. It's the "have". Just like drink/drank/drunk or stink/stank/stunk. - 75.133.80.44 (talk) 18:54, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I came here wondering the same thing. In International English shrank is the past tense of shrink. Shrunk is the past participle. The past participle is the form used with have or had as in I have shrunk the t shirt. Basically, without have the title is incorrect and should be shrank. This is how the verb works in most varieties of English but as this is an American film maybe shrunk is considered OK as the past tense in American English. Tried reading the information on the m-w.com website but, like many commercial websites it's full of adverts and continually reloads the page. Much better to rely on a language source which isn't as commercial like the Oxford Dictionary. Never heard of Merriam-Webster - I presume it is an American dictionary?--151.37.17.63 (talk) 22:51, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Never heard of Merriam-Webster - I presume it is an American dictionary?" - indeed it is ... and one that appears to use the well-known "Molesworth" spelling system. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.7.147.13 (talk) 17:37, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Honey I Shrunk the kids.jpg

Image:Honey I Shrunk the kids.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:03, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What no soundtrack?

I don't get why this doesn't even ahve a soundtrack i've never even seen the film-unamed user

Astro

According to http://duckduckgo.com/c/Comedy_science_fiction_films (and various other sites) this film is also called The AstroMind Professor, but not sure where. Is it worth mentioning it on this page, seeing as it is mentioned on the page for the ride?--TimothyJacobson (talk) 22:37, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Am going to mention it on the page, with the reference, feel free to remove--TimothyJacobson (talk) 11:05, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Producer

In attempting to fix Steven Spielberg's filmography page, I saw that this movie was recently removed from it. As best as I can tell, he produced a short film that ran along with the movie but not this movie itself. I'm not sure exactly how such a scenario should be handled and saw no relevant discussions so I removed the "Movies produced by Steven Spielberg" category for consistency. 173.46.238.149 (talk) 20:16, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Honey, I Shrunk the Kids. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724093734/http://drgoresfunhouse.com/interviews/ed-naha/ to http://drgoresfunhouse.com/interviews/ed-naha/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:11, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]