Jump to content

Talk:Holbeach Air Weapons Range

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

RAF station or DIO Holbeach AWR?

[edit]
  • Nightsturm has requested a move back to RAF Holbeach; GeoffreyT2000 pinged me. Discussion is at the WP:RM/Tech but I have added a note to this page for information. Nightsturm said that RAF Station was the official name of the place and that is what the gate sign still said.
  • My answer: "My impression was that the official name was Defence Infrastructure Organisation Holbeach Air Weapons Range (a mouthful!!) since transfer to the DIO in 2006-07. It does not appear to be under the control of the RAF, rather DIO. I would not have moved the page had I believed the official title was still RAF Holbeach. I think we need to have a reliable sources-for-the-site-name compilation, including some sort of photo for the main gate sign!! My guess is that nobody's changed the gate sign, DIO simply isn't worried about what the gate sign says, and colloquially of course everybody in the locality still calls it an RAF station."
  • If that is the case we face a WP:COMMONNAME issue: what the people in the locality call it? or what the organisation charts in Sutton Coldfield designate it? Buckshot06 (talk) 04:13, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Other air weapons ranges

[edit]

Dear Nightsturm this is not an official MOD document, site, or page. We do not maintain "Miscellaneous" notes that have little or nothing to do with this particular site on this site's page. Like the Royal Air Force or Ministry of Defence Wikipedia maintains a hierarchical order of organisational data. Other Air Weapons Ranges are (a) no longer under the control of the Royal Air Force; (b) not intrinsically WP:NOTABLE as regards this particular area of land on the Lincolnshire coast. I removed the listing of other current AWRs and added the data to Bombing range; Defence Training Estate; and Defence Infrastructure Organisation; if I had uncovered reliable sources I would have also added it to RAF Strike Command, which seemingly previously controlled the ranges before DTE. Those are the hierarchical superiors-in-command to the Holbeach site.

I am about to remove, again, the irrelevant listing of other AWRs from this page. Should you attempt to readd the irrelevant data again, I will raise this with an administrator. This page should be for the history of RAF Holbeach and Holbeach AWR, not for details about other sites hundreds of miles away. Buckshot06 (talk) 07:08, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 March 2022

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Those opposed to the proposed move were more numerous, and they provided rationales based on the WP:CRITERIA. Much of the debate was over the COMMONNAME, with sources supporting both titles. Editors noted that newer, more official sources tend to use Holbeach AWR, with colloquial usage and signage favoring RAF Holbeach. In the absence of a clear winner on that point, it came down to the other criteria, mainly precision. More participants and the greater strength of arguments favored the status quo. (non-admin closure) Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 02:46, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Holbeach Air Weapons Range → RAF Holbeach – the former page/article title was fine "RAF Holbeach", this is the official name still in use, gate entrance to the site also states "Royal Air Force Holbeach". Nightsturm (talk) 22:21, 8 March 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Steel1943 (talk) 04:51, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Lennart97 (talk) 13:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Nightsturm, GeoffreyT2000, Buckshot06, 102.140.240.12, and Kj cheetham: See here. Lennart97 (talk) 13:44, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting discussion. I would tend to agree that the article should be named "Holbeach Air Weapons Range".
If the site was still officially called RAF Holbeach then it seems unlikely that DIO would install a new sign saying Holbeach AWR. The RAF Holbeach sign would appear to have simply been left over rather than removed when the new sign was put up. On that basis I'm fairly convinced the official name is Holbeach AWR.
The continued use of RAF Holbeach is largely colloquial or in some cases just left over from when it was under RAF control. This seems to occur with many sites that were formerly RAF stations but are retained for other military roles such as training airfields (e.g Little Rissington, Kirknewton etc)
In considering WP:COMMONNAME, as said above I agree there is evidence that some still use RAF Holbeach. However, I think using it for the title would now be somewhat misleading as the RAF no longer operate it and I think its fairly clear that it's no longer officially known as an RAF station. Holbeach AWR as a title is clear and precise as to what the article is about (if not more so than RAF Holbeach) and using it shouldn't cause anyone looking for the article any problems in finding it, meeting the requirements of WP:CRITERIA. It would also be consistent with Tain AWR and Donna Nook AWR articles, though I did only rename them fairly recently. Thx811 (talk) 22:26, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Holbeach_Air_Weapons_Range&oldid=1207613009"