Talk:High Tunstall College of Science

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

North East England Low‑importance

	North East England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject North East England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North East EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject North East EnglandTemplate:WikiProject North East EnglandNorth East England articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Italic text i think we need to make the wall out side d block better

Fair use rationale for Image:Hightunstallschoolcard.jpg

Image:Hightunstallschoolcard.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:36, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Im removing the part

about the middle class area, and the children being abused for this, its simply not true, there is equal banter between all the schools in the area, and High Tunstall isn't singled out. The main rivialry is EMS and Brierton, due to the catholic protestant clashes, and the close proximity. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.23.207.52 (talk) 18:34, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"The school was originally a boys technical school, but adopted its current form and name in 1973 after changes in the British schools system." No it wasn't! It was built in 1973 and always had the name High Tunstall Comprehensive. I was in the first form the year it opened with a comprehensive intake. Admittedly the years above us were filled with the boys from Lynn Street Secondary Tech and the girls Technical school, who were there for a (few) terms previous, but it was never a Secondary Technical School. For some reason I am unable to edit the relivent part of the article. Alan Morgan (F4 1973/4). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 57.67.16.50 (talk) 18:49, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Section needs work

The section "High Tunstall originally emerged as the most disruptive school in the area of Hartlepool, although it is purported, due to aledged improvements in the staff and facilities, to have improved. It is located near to the West Park area of Hartlepool, which is an area with high land values, and so is often associated with right wing, middle class students." is unclear, expresses the author's opinion and does not cite any sources. When did High Tunstall emerge as the "most disruptive school", according to whom? Who aledges (sic) that the school has improved? There is a suggestion here that not everyone agrees with this allegation, is this suggestion accurate? Who associates High Tunstall with "right wing" students? These claims need evidence. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.125.53.233 (talk) 16:21, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]