Talk:High Energy Astronomy Observatory 3

Spaceflight Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Start

I just expanded this from a bare stub. It still needs some substance about the scientific significance of the three instruments and their results. There are nice diagrams available at NASA that I believe can be adapted for each instrument, but I am as yet inexperienced in the uploading of images, especially the fair-use issues, so I will leave that for now and get to it later if someone else does not fill them in. Wwheaton (talk) 03:13, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have corrected some of the information about the gamma-ray spectrometer, and beefed up the references. It is now somewhat out of balance with the two cosmic-ray experiments, about which I know little. All three are badly in need of scientific highlights. Having been involved in C1, I can provide some of this for it from my own files and library refs (should I worry about COI & POV?) but not C2 & C3, alas. Wwheaton (talk) 01:20, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

High Energy Astronomy Observatory

The title of the article is actually incorrect I think, as it was really Astronomy, not Astrophysics. Google finds 34,000+ hits on the correct phrase, only 1,500 on the other. I think I would actually recommend "HEAO 3" as the most likely target, and redirect the other possibilities. Wwheaton (talk) 04:33, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Errors in the literature

I have seen enough errors in the web pages on this material that I though I would start a place to itemize them, and say why I think they are wrong:

1 Name of the observatory is actually the "High Energy Astronomy Observatory 3", ie, not Astrophysics. This applies to the whole series, all three observatories. Somebody with more experience than I might do well to move them all, and redirect the names, to keep from perpetrating an ongoing mistake. (Try both on Google and see.)

2 HEAO 3 ran out of cryogen (solid methane and solid ammonia, in a passive 2-stage cooler) on 1 June 1980, not 29 May 1981 as the HEASARC web page says. This was about when we were expecting, only a little early, and the effective end of the spectrometer's operation. You can verify this in the HEAO 3 instrument papers, probably in Mahoney W.A. et al (1980) Nucl Instr & Meth. 178; 19; 1980 in particular, or in Wheaton et al 1989, AIP Conf Proc. on the High Energy Radiation Background in Space", pp 304-322. The date given by HEASARC may be the date when the CsI shield stopped working, which had some value for monitoring gamma-ray bursts and solar flares. The spacecraft re-entered on 7 Dec. 1981. A further issue sometimes not mentioned is that the Ge detectors were damaged by cosmic-rays, tapped (Van Allen) radiation, and neutrons from the Earth, so that their energy resolution began to degrade as time passed. The degradation was roughly proportional to energy as well as time, so worse at high energies. Thus the effective line sensitivity was somewhat worse at mid-gamma-ray energies after a couple of months in orbit. This turned out to be a property of the p-type Ge and the electrode configuration that was used, but that was not known until too close to launch to change the instrument configuration.

Wwheaton (talk) 23:32, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"3rd High Energy Astronomy Observatory", not "3rd High Energy Astrophysics Observatory"

Moved to restore correct original title. There is considerable confusion in the literature, notably on NASA HESARC pages, which have it both ways. This agrees with my memory (I was involved in HEAO 1 & 3), and with Google hit ratio on "High Energy Astronomy Observatory" vs "High Energy Astrophysics Observatory", of about 33,000 to 1,300, as of this date. Wwheaton (talk) 03:41, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]