Jump to content

Talk:Hattha Bank

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposed merge

[edit]

Hello, I have issued a draft on the same subject. Next week I will try to perform a merge of our two articles. You can see my draft here: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Lucie-boyer/sandbox . I will be very pleased to hear you comments. Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucie-boyer (talkcontribs) 08:59, 25 July 2014‎

@Lucie-boyer: In the absence of any comments to the contrary, assuming the draft you have created to be good enough, do consider starting the merge. Your draft seems far fuller. It has been criticised as potentially promotional, which is something you can address during the merge process. Fiddle Faddle 20:51, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion moved from Draft talk:Hattha Kaksekar Limited

[edit]

The following discussion took place on the talk page of a draft which has been deleted, since its author has moved his/her own content to this article.—Anne Delong (talk) 13:03, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My article cannot be published because it already exists. I've informed the author of the finished article on the talk page I wanted to perform a merger 4 days ago and he or she haven't reply since then. Is an history merger required ? What is the next step of the process? Thank you in advance for your help and advice. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Hattha_Kaksekar_Limited https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Lucie-boyer/sandbox

You can simply edit the mainspace article yourself to include your material. Since you are effectively the only author of this draft, there is no need to do a history-merge to provide attribution. When you have finished with the draft, you can put {{db-user}} at the top to request deletion.
Note that Wikipedia articles do not have any specified "author" - see WP:OWN. Anyone can edit any article, so you do not need permission from any previous author to edit this, and in turn what you write may be changed by others. Relevant guidelines you might like to read are WP:Be bold and WP:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle, which explains what to do if your edits are reverted.
A word of advice - your draft reads very much like the company telling the world its story about itself, its "vision", its "mission", its future plans... An encyclopedia article should be more a description of the company from outside, based largely on independent sources, not the company's own site and press releases.
If you are connected with the company, please read the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 14:30, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Process

[edit]

In absence of any other comments I am starting the merger. Lucie

The merge process is finished. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucie-boyer (talkcontribs) 01:04, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Question

[edit]

Now that I updated the article and that I have added references is it possible to take off the 'multiple issues 'message ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucie-boyer (talkcontribs) 01:10, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Hattha Kaksekar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:55, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hattha Kaksekar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:52, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]