Talk:Hattha Bank

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Finance & Investment Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cambodia Low‑importance

Hattha Bank is part of WikiProject Cambodia, a project to improve all Cambodia-related articles. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group on Wikipedia, aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Cambodia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.CambodiaWikipedia:WikiProject CambodiaTemplate:WikiProject CambodiaCambodia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cambodia To-do:

Let us work in the best reference and presentation of archaeological sites of Cambodia beyond Angkor like Sambor Prei Kuk, Angkor Borei (Takeo), etc.

Should disambiguate Republican Party for Democracy and Renewal and generally try to link up social conscience with right-wing values.

I'm looking for the best picture or any informations about the KAF's U-6 (Beaver). It seem that the KAF had 3 aircrafts. But in 1971, during the viet cong's sapper attack at the Pochentong Air Base,at least 1 Beaver was destroyed.In 1972 at leat 1 Beaver was refurbished with a new engine. http://www.khmerairforce.com/AAK-KAF/AVNK-AAK-KAF/Cambodia-Beaver-KAF.JPG

Thankfull for this info. [Unsigned]

Proposed merge

Hello, I have issued a draft on the same subject. Next week I will try to perform a merge of our two articles. You can see my draft here: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Lucie-boyer/sandbox . I will be very pleased to hear you comments. Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucie-boyer (talk • contribs) 08:59, 25 July 2014‎

@Lucie-boyer: In the absence of any comments to the contrary, assuming the draft you have created to be good enough, do consider starting the merge. Your draft seems far fuller. It has been criticised as potentially promotional, which is something you can address during the merge process. Fiddle Faddle 20:51, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion moved from Draft talk:Hattha Kaksekar Limited

The following discussion took place on the talk page of a draft which has been deleted, since its author has moved his/her own content to this article.—Anne Delong (talk) 13:03, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

My article cannot be published because it already exists. I've informed the author of the finished article on the talk page I wanted to perform a merger 4 days ago and he or she haven't reply since then. Is an history merger required ? What is the next step of the process? Thank you in advance for your help and advice. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Hattha_Kaksekar_Limited https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Lucie-boyer/sandbox

You can simply edit the mainspace article yourself to include your material. Since you are effectively the only author of this draft, there is no need to do a history-merge to provide attribution. When you have finished with the draft, you can put {{db-user}} at the top to request deletion.

Note that Wikipedia articles do not have any specified "author" - see WP:OWN. Anyone can edit any article, so you do not need permission from any previous author to edit this, and in turn what you write may be changed by others. Relevant guidelines you might like to read are WP:Be bold and WP:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle, which explains what to do if your edits are reverted.

A word of advice - your draft reads very much like the company telling the world its story about itself, its "vision", its "mission", its future plans... An encyclopedia article should be more a description of the company from outside, based largely on independent sources, not the company's own site and press releases.

If you are connected with the company, please read the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 14:30, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Process

In absence of any other comments I am starting the merger. Lucie

The merge process is finished. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucie-boyer (talk • contribs) 01:04, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Now that I updated the article and that I have added references is it possible to take off the 'multiple issues 'message ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucie-boyer (talk • contribs) 01:10, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Hattha Kaksekar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140209172654/http://www.triplejump.eu:80/anmf/ to http://www.triplejump.eu/anmf/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:55, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hattha Kaksekar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:52, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]