Talk:Hatch (e-commerce company)
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hatch (e-commerce company) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 3 January 2020
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved to "Hatch (e-commerce company)". (non-admin closure) Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:20, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
Hatch (company) → Hatch (software company) Hatch (e-commerce company) – Per WP:PRECISE, Hatch Ltd is also about a company, so the title is ambiguous. There is likely a better disambiguator. The current title can be redirected to the DAB Hatch#Other uses, although Hatch Ltd is probably primary topic for it. 94.21.10.204 (talk) 04:55, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
- Move to Hatch (e-commerce company) as more accurate. I'd also support move Hatch Ltd → Hatch (engineering company) as the "Ltd" isn't a common part of the name. Redirect Hatch (company) to the disambiguation page section per WP:INCDAB. Alternatively, I'd support going with (Icelandic company) and (Canadian company) respectively. Both of these articles lack independent, reliable sources - they seem to mostly revolve around primary sources and press releases, so the come off as advertising. -- Netoholic @ 07:45, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, "e-commerce company" is better, and I've amended my nomination. I was casting around for disambiguators already in use elsewhere. I considered the geographical disambiguators, but since they both have worldwide presence I am not sure they would serve readers well. 94.21.10.204 (talk) 08:44, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.