Talk:Hartford Union Station

Connecticut Mid‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Stations Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.

This article lacks references.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No support for proposed move. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:56, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hartford Union Station → Union Station (Hartford, Connecticut) — This page should be moved to match the (City, State) naming convention. It can't be moved the traditional way because the new name is a redirect. Murjax (talk) 01:04, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Of the 93 articles in Category:Union stations in the United States, fewer than 40 are named in that way. I don't see the significance of a convention used by a minority of articles that it should affect. Nyttend (talk) 04:41, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Now that I think of it this is a confusing convention if there is one. The first time I saw it was a few months ago with Springfield Union Station (Springfield, Massachusetts) as to distinguish it from Springfield Union Station (Springfield, Illinois). Then I saw Union Station (New Haven, Connecticut) named the same way so I assumed it was a NEW naming convention. If anyone could clarify this I would appreciate it. Murjax (talk) 05:16, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Replying to Murjax's question to Nyttend: I think the most basic naming rule is that a place should be called by the most commonly used name for a place. It seems from usage in the article, at least, that "Hartford Union Station" is the commonly and historically used name that should be used. Because there are a number of places whose common name is the same, just "Union Station", though, those ones have to get a disambiguating parenthetical phrase tacked onto their wikipedia article name. The parenthetical phrase is not part of the place's actual name, which should be shown in bold in the lede of the article. By the way, I prefer that the parenthetical disambiguation be in format (City, State) for U.S. stations for compatibility to the use of (City, State) for disambiguating NRHPs and other U.S. places. Here, there is just one known "Hartford Union Station" so the article can get just that, with no disambiguating phrase needed. doncram (talk) 19:39, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as the current title is simpler and apparently more common. I would support striking the first or second "Springfield" from those stations, though, in the interest of common sense. Ucucha 13:30, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.