Talk:Harold Edwards (mathematician)

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Mathematics

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's priority scale.

Inaccessible reference

I found a review for Edwards' Divisor Theory by R. Bölling in, of all places, Biometrical Journal 33(4):516, 1991, doi:10.1002/bimj.4710330421. However my campus' site subscriptions don't seem to give me access to this one. Can anyone else read it and summarize it for our article? Alternatively, maybe there is a decent review published elsewhere? I suppose we can always just go with Ştefănescu's review in MathSciNet, MR 1200892, and there's a little material about this in the Whiteman prize citation, but it's frustrating knowing about the existence of a source and not being able to use it. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:28, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

relevance?

What is the relevance of his being married to a breast cancer survivor? Seems a little off-topic to me. --Matt Westwood 10:10, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To me, the intent of this sentence is "His wife is also notable. Here is what she is notable for." —David Eppstein (talk) 14:53, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, but thought I'd ask, because to me this sentence jarred somewhat. No worries. --Matt Westwood 22:35, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]