Talk:Harlingen Lighthouse

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Harlingen Lighthouse article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Frisia (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Frisia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.FrisiaWikipedia:WikiProject FrisiaTemplate:WikiProject FrisiaFrisia

Hotels Low‑importance

	Hotels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hotels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the hospitality industry, including hotels, motels, resorts, and destination spas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HotelsWikipedia:WikiProject HotelsTemplate:WikiProject HotelsHotels
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lighthouses Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lighthouses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lighthouses and other water navigational aids on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LighthousesWikipedia:WikiProject LighthousesTemplate:WikiProject LighthousesLighthouses
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands

Untitled

I think this page needs a section on why this lighthouse is significant, even if only known locally. DPU331 (talk) 18:00, 19 May 2013 (UTC) I wrote a section on "Use" to acknowledge the significance of the lighthouse. I also added an "In the Media" section to recognize some of the notoriety the lighthouse has gained. DPU331 (talk) 19:59, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I added a quote from the lighthouse keeper, explaining how he was actually glad it got turned into a hotel. This is actually pretty interesting! Esauj (talk) 04:06, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I added a link to the Wikipedia lighthouse page (at the start of this article) and another reference in the media. We should also try to connect this article to others on Wikipedia. Esauj (talk) 04:25, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone know how to connect this article to the projects that are suggested on this talk page? The lighthouse project and hotel project both seem like a good place to link this article. Might be a good thing to look into. Esauj (talk) 04:48, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Noticed that my Huffinton Post reference was all sorts of messed up. Fought with it and got it working right! Esauj (talk) 04:47, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the content puffing the hotel. The "Vuurtoren van Harlingen" hotel source is marginally acceptable as a source for clearly factual information, but not for opinion about the hotel. The CNN content is just an excerpt from the hotel site, adding no information. Anyone can add an entry to the Huffington post site, so it is not acceptable. Ditto Lighthouses of Europe - anyone can add their own entry. Wikipedia is not in the business of advertising hotels. Aymatth2 (talk) 12:28, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I was not aware that those sources were opinion based. I will look for more objective information. DPU331 (talk) 21:37, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like most of our page was not acceptable. Large sections got removed. Anyone have other (better) resources we can use to add more info? Esauj (talk) 20:57, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like a wet blanket on this, but Wikipedia attracts a lot of attempts to advertise businesses. Where there may be a commercial aspect we have to be particularly careful to only use sources that are both reliable and independent. Maybe there are not a lot of sources that discuss this lighthouse because it is not very old, a conventional design and not much history: not a lot to say. But if you look at List of lighthouses in the Netherlands, there are plenty that need articles. Or check Category:Lists of lighthouses - all sorts of missing articles. Possibly this one could be used as an example of the structure for an article on another lighthouse. Aymatth2 (talk) 00:41, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the suggestions. We are still very new at this, so we appreciate the advice and help. We will look into the other pages you suggested. Esauj (talk) 21:52, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me like the page is coming together nicely. I added a quote from the former lighthouse keeper that may provide some context regarding the lighthouse's importance. JGP640 (talk) 19:10, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just added a little additional background information. The page looks really nice--so impressed by whoever figured out how to get images into the pageJcedarb (talk) 21:21, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough with respect to the quote getting removed. It wasn't that informational and obviously wasn't objective. I think the page looks great and succinctly discusses the lighthouse. Adding anything else at this point would would probably just diminish the page's value... JGP640 (talk) 22:27, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unless anyone has found some sort of major historical significance.... ?? JGP640 (talk) 22:29, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the only information that we could add would be about how it now serves as a hotel, but that would be advertising, so I think we have all of the information we can get. DPU331 (talk) 23:46, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Advertising and copyright violations

I removed the lengthy quotation from "Unusual Hotels of the World" for two reasons. We have no evidence that the author has surrendered copyright. The source also seems very far from independent since it quotes prices and has a booking form. I tried it, and got the response "Thank you. We have submitted your booking inquiry to Lighthouse – Harlingen and you can expect a reply within 2 working days. We have also sent a copy to you at zyz@what.com." I strongly recommend leaving this one and working on other lighthouses that are not trying to drum up business from tourists. Aymatth2 (talk) 22:33, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's fair. We didn't intend for it to sound like an advertisement for the hotel that now occupies the space. Jcedarb (talk) 23:45, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Harlingen Lighthouse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130815010100/http://www.vuurtoren-harlingen.nl/eng/index1a.php to http://www.vuurtoren-harlingen.nl/eng/index1a.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:06, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]