Talk:Hal Hinte/GA1
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 22:51, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: AirshipJungleman29 (talk · contribs) 13:10, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
I'll take this. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:10, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
General comments
[edit]- Source spotcheck passed.
- As with your last short GAN I reviewed, I think we want to make sure that it's as detailed as possible. So to that end:
- Height and weight should be mentioned and cited in the body.
- I disagree. There is nothing unique about his height or weight in the sources. The "Stats at Pro Football Reference" cover the citation of the material in the infobox. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:28, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Link "letterman"
- Done. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:25, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Source 2 indicates he intended to join the army after leaving college.
- Added. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:28, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Source 3 notes that he was an assistant coach at a Pittsburgh high school for a year, and that his transfer from the Packers to Pittsburgh may been due to him being drafted for WW2. Also has a different weight.
- Added. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:29, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Source 6 indicates that he was on a Pittsburgh roster for 1943? also a talent for anticipating the opposition tactics.
- Added. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:25, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Could have more details about his boxing career—he was a heavyweight, fought under the name of Billy Sullivan, etc.
- Added. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:19, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- I suppose the image in e.g. source 10 is not copyright free?
- Newspaper pictures are really tricky unless copyright is clearly stated or it is old enough to be public domain. This is neither. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:25, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Height and weight should be mentioned and cited in the body.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:26, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- AirshipJungleman29 thank you for the review! I just got back from a three day hike, so catching up on a few things. I will try to get to this today or tomorrow. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:01, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- AirshipJungleman29 I have addressed or responded to all of your items above. Let me know if there is anything else. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:29, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.