Jump to content

Talk:Hal Hinte

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk18:18, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Gonzo fan2007 (talk). Self-nominated at 15:45, 7 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Jug Bennett; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Bennett meets all the criteria. BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:37, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • For Zuver:
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Zuver meets all the criteria (albeit barely, as the length is only a couple of letters over the limit - expansion would be nice but is not required). BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:24, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • For Sturgeon:
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Sturgeon meets all the criteria. BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:43, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • For Englemann:
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Englemann meets all the criteria (just passes the length requirement - though further expansion is not required, I see a few additional details you might want to add from the German Wikipedia of all places, including that he narrowly missed qualifying for the 1928 Olympics and was inducted into the South Dakota Hall of Fame). BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:43, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • For Schammel:
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Schammel meets all the criteria. BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:56, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • For Hinte:
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Hinte meets all the criteria. BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:56, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • For Butler:
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Butler meets all the criteria (albeit barely, being seven characters over the limit). BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:56, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Hal Hinte/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 22:51, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: AirshipJungleman29 (talk · contribs) 13:10, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:10, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

General comments

[edit]
  • Source spotcheck passed.
  • As with your last short GAN I reviewed, I think we want to make sure that it's as detailed as possible. So to that end:
    • Height and weight should be mentioned and cited in the body.
      • I disagree. There is nothing unique about his height or weight in the sources. The "Stats at Pro Football Reference" cover the citation of the material in the infobox. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:28, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Link "letterman"
    • Source 2 indicates he intended to join the army after leaving college.
    • Source 3 notes that he was an assistant coach at a Pittsburgh high school for a year, and that his transfer from the Packers to Pittsburgh may been due to him being drafted for WW2. Also has a different weight.
    • Source 6 indicates that he was on a Pittsburgh roster for 1943? also a talent for anticipating the opposition tactics.
    • Could have more details about his boxing career—he was a heavyweight, fought under the name of Billy Sullivan, etc.
    • I suppose the image in e.g. source 10 is not copyright free?

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:26, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AirshipJungleman29 thank you for the review! I just got back from a three day hike, so catching up on a few things. I will try to get to this today or tomorrow. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:01, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
AirshipJungleman29 I have addressed or responded to all of your items above. Let me know if there is anything else. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:29, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.