Talk:HEI Hotels & Resorts

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 November 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Connecticut Low‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Travel and Tourism: Hotels Mid‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Hotels.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

On "Speedy Deletion"

I started working on the HEI article because the group has been getting a lot of press due to labor disputes and related student protests, and the lack of a Wikipedia article is making it difficult to get accurate information about HEI.

Yale Daily News on a sit-in based on HEI practices: http://www.yaledailynews.com/articles/view/26655

I'm finding it hard to find reliable information about HEI. Their "history" page doesn't even *work* on my machine: http://www.heihotels.com/about_us/evolution.cfm

They control over $1 billion in controversial private equity funds and numerous upscale hotels, so I don't think relevance is in question.

Best,

--Rmozone (talk) 00:16, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If what you say about "a lot of press" is correct, then this needs to be cited in the article. Even if the current article is deleted this is not the end of the world, because a properly cited article asserting the notability (if it can be asserted) of HEI can always be recreated.

Note that nothing in any article may be original research nor may several news articles be used to synthesise such research. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 00:20, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]