Talk:Grok (web framework)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Impartial?

Marked as not-impartial enough? Ah, a big improvement would probably to list the capabilities and characteristics without making a value statement about other web frameworks. So no "grok is better than django because of the component architecture".

Reinout (talk) 15:09, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. I think some code examples would be nice to explain the difference and would make it seem less advertisy. --OpenFuture (talk) 16:44, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think the original text is actually not as bad as it seems, it can just be easily misread: "This way Grok is a step forward to popular Python web frameworks like TurboGears, Pylons and Django" is *intended* to read, in my understanding, as saying Grok is trying to move in the direction of these frameworks, not that it's a step *beyond* these frameworks. It can however be far too easily misread. I've tried to put at least the references to other web frameworks back in the article as I think it's useful to the reader in mental categorization and in understanding Grok's aims, but feel free to improve. Martijn Faassen (talk) 19:13, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grok (web framework). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080824224921/http://grok.zope.org/about/why-grok to http://grok.zope.org/about/why-grok

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:58, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]