Jump to content

Talk:Grindr/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2

File:IPhone-home-page-slideshow-01.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:IPhone-home-page-slideshow-01.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:53, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

"embellished prudery"

The application has been a subject of controversy, as many users claim that they were banned due to prejudice and embellished prudery. Please explain what in the hell this means. --RThompson82 (talk) 11:48, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

I have no idea. Be bold and change it if you like. Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:42, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Why nothing about Jack'D

Jack'D seems to be even more popular, buz why don't we find any information her in WP? Jack'D is free of charge btw. ++--84.73.123.149 (talk) 11:33, 29 October 2012 (UTC)--++

Spam robots and lying to customers

The spam robot problem deserves a mention in the article, so does the company's feigned customer service and bullshit "We're working on the problem" line. The app has been around 5 years now and the spam robots are worse than ever, meaning the company isn't doing anything about it. Their programmers need a swift kick to the face, to be honest. --98.246.156.76 (talk) 00:40, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Dating app until the end of the article when it's hookup

How interesting (to me) that the article starts out saying "dating app" but when it gets to the "Holocaust...blah, blah blah" part it changes to "hookup". Breedentials (talk) 01:51, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

The article uses Grindr's old logo which updated in October of 2013. The new logo has no "teeth", which is made obvious by the company website: http://grindr.com/ Mikyung5 (talk) 15:48, 27 April 2015 (UTC) Mikyung

Drug Use

I have blanked the section. Reasoning: the cited Bindham 2014 article does not mention Grindr or dating apps. That is the only authority on the point in the EMCDDA report and therefore it is an unreliable source on that point (not generally). 2nd EMCDDA piece did not that that Grindr 'promoted' drug use. The wikipedia editor confused the sentence mentioning Grindr with the next sentence which referred to apps explicitly containing illicit drug related content. [IP fixed and host name will reveal my identity so not anon] 131.111.128.45 (talk) 06:55, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Someone put it back, but I'm deleting it again. Over half the entry is about how Grindr sucks. It's overkill and similar apps oriented to heterosexuals are not treated with equal disgust. 177.41.1.140 (talk) 22:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)