Talk:Green Bay East–Green Bay West football rivalry
Appearance
Green Bay East–Green Bay West football rivalry has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 30, 2019. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Green Bay East–Green Bay West football rivalry appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 November 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:52, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Green Bay East–Green Bay West football rivalry/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 17:14, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Comments
- I'm not sure you should be using an em-dash here, rather it ought to be an en-dash. Indeed, later in the lead you have " the East-West rivalry" hyphenated...
- Page renamed.
- " 62–49–3," this could use some "hover over" text or similar for those who aren't aware this means W-L-T.
- Added. Now signifies East wins/West wins/ties.
- "played in the East-West rivalry" is this an ENGVAR thing when you say a coach "played" in the rivalry?
- I have updated this so it is more clear that Lambeau was in the rivalry as a player but later inducted to the HOF as a coach.
- "Milwaukee Journal Sentinel " should be in italics.
- Done.
- "on November 30, 1905 at" comma after 1905.
- Done.
- The lead says it was played annually since 1905 but there's no sign of a 1906 edition.
- The article notes that the district cancelled the 1906 game only to reverse the decision. Added to lead.
- Should the table of results have a footnote relating to the uncertainty over the score of the 1905 match?
- Sure, if you feel it should, but I'm not sure how to add it via source editor.
- " to win 7 straight" seven.
- Fixed.
- " Despite fears of the series.... " too many run-on clauses here.
- Fixed.
- Where is the Spanish flu fears/cancellations referenced?
- Ref added.
- " Green Bay Press-Gazette" italics.
- Fixed.
- " seven of the next 16" seven/sixteen or 7/16.
- Fixed.
- " citing near-zero " which temperature scale?
- Added.
- It's a shame attendance isn't included in the overall table of results.
- I agree. It's not in the source, however.
- "—East against Preble and West against Southwest--" looks like an em-dash and two hyphens. Suggest you replace both with en-dashes.
- Fixed.
- "The report of the first game from the December 1st, 1905 issue of the Press-Gazette." (1) fragment so no period, (2) date-> December 1, 1905 (3) comma after 1905 (4) italics for newspaper.
- Altered the caption. I really do not think there needs to be a comma after the year (as it was or is now).
- "1905—2005" should be an en-dash, not an em-dash.
- Fixed.
- Does the table meet the minimum requirements of MOS:ACCESS e.g. row and col scopes?
- I honestly don't know, because I'm using a template? Guidance accepted here.
- "NFL Alumni" alumni.
- Fixed.
- Tables aren't sortable so don't overlink terms e.g. Green Bay Packers is linked every time and no need for that.
- Delinked.
That's it on a first run through. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 11:49, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
- OK, The Rambling Man, I've gone through and made most of the changes. I'm a little confused about how to implement the table fixes you talked about, so I would appreciate some extra explanation or help. Replies to your comments in italics. Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 17:09, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
- Edit: OK, I think I did the MOS:ACCESS headings for the table of alumni? Still would appreciate feedback, as no one has ever raised this point on a GAN before. Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 17:13, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
- I know, I'm sorry, I'm applying more stringent comments (which are actually optional, but beneficial to our readers). Thanks for taking them on board and working with them. I've made a couple of tweaks but I'm generally happy now that the article passes GA. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 17:18, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
- Edit: OK, I think I did the MOS:ACCESS headings for the table of alumni? Still would appreciate feedback, as no one has ever raised this point on a GAN before. Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 17:13, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
- OK, The Rambling Man, I've gone through and made most of the changes. I'm a little confused about how to implement the table fixes you talked about, so I would appreciate some extra explanation or help. Replies to your comments in italics. Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 17:09, 30 September 2019 (UTC)