Talk:Granville station (SkyTrain)

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.

Canada: British Columbia / Vancouver Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Vancouver (assessed as Low-importance).

busiest station...

The picture with the caption "The subway platform at Granville Station is one of the busiest in the SkyTrain system." seems very very empty. It gives the impression that the skytrain system is quite empty. Perhaps a picture taken at rush hour would be more suited? Ardent ^†alk _∈ 06:17, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely, will see if I can't get down there one of these days with my camera during rush hour. It may take some time though. RichMac (Talk) 06:27, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's because the only time it's the busiest is during rush hour. When I was a courier in Vancouver, I frequently took the SkyTrain, often several times during the day. Other than rush hour it is as busy as any other station. --Kmsiever 15:30, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]