Talk:Good Together (song)

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Canada: Music Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian music.

Country music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Country music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to country music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Country musicWikipedia:WikiProject Country musicTemplate:WikiProject Country musicCountry music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Requested move 22 February 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

It was proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved.

result:
No consensus. See no agreement below to rename these pages at this time. Follow-thru on the album draft is warranted. As is usual with a no consensus outcome, editors can strengthen their rationales and try again in a few months to garner consensus for these page moves. Kudos to editors for your input, and Happy, Healthy Publishing! (nac by page mover) P.I. Ellsworth ed. ^put'r there 16:34, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Links: current log • target log

This is template {{subst:Requested move/end}}

Requesting to move this page to the “Good Together” page, and make that current page a disambiguation page. This “Good Together” is the only current “Good Together” that actually has a proper page for itself. There is no need to differentiate so long as there are no other “Good Together” pages. Yeehaw45 (talk) 22:45, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support both moves - Support both moves, so long as this is the only "Good Together" with an article. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:32, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 14:38, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
is a song stub that charted 6 in Canada Country (Billboard) in 2018 a primary topic? Also, something strange. Why was Good Together (album) moved to Draft:Good Together (album) when all other albums by the band stand? https://www.google.co.uk/search?tbo=p&tbm=bks&q=%22good+together%22+%22a+certain+ratio%22&num=10 seems to be sufficient sourcing. In ictu oculi (talk) 20:52, 23 February 2021 (UTC) In ictu oculi (talk) 20:53, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
A page with this title has previously been moved or deleted.

If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the user(s) who performed the action(s) listed below.

15:58, 6 September 2020 @JJMC89: talk contribs deleted page Good Together (album) (R2: Cross-namespace redirect from mainspace) Tag: Twinkle (thank)

10:14, 5 September 2020 @Mccapra: talk contribs moved page Good Together (album) to Draft:Good Together (album) (Undersourced, incubate in draftspace (via script)) (revert) (thank)

Oppose, restore draftspaced album + add book sources https://pageviews.toolforge.org/?project=wiki.riteme.site&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&range=latest-20&pages=Good_Together_(Shy_Martin_song)%7CGood_Together_(James_Barker_Band_song)%7CI%27d_Like_to_See_You_Again%7CForce_(A_Certain_Ratio_album)%7CChange_the_Station%7CMind_Made_Up -- pretty clear from page views that any A Certain Ratio album gets more views than this Canadian country song. In ictu oculi (talk) 21:06, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I would like to note that while that is a valid argument, this page for the James Barker Band song has not even been up for a week. I'm not sure that comparing views between longstanding articles and a new article shows proof of anything just yet. Yeehaw45 (talk) 16:09, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose and restore the draft album per IIO. It's clear from the page views that the James Barker song is not the primary topic. Also the album does not seem worse referenced than a lot of stuff we have here, it has a decent list for such a short page, and should not have been deleted like that. — Amakuru (talk) 23:11, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per In ictu oculi and Amakuru. WP:NOPRIMARYTOPIC. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 08:51, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Blanked album restored per above

https://pageviews.toolforge.org/?project=wiki.riteme.site&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&range=all-time&pages=Good_Together_(James_Barker_Band_song)%7CGood_Together_(album)

Requested move 20 July 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Good Together (song) per WP:SONGDAB. No such user (talk) 10:31, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good Together (James Barker Band song) → Good Together (song)

- I am requesting to move this page to "Good Together (song)" with no name disambiguation. As per. WP:SONGDAB, "unless more than one article about songs of the same name exist, there is no need to disambiguate any further." Thus, this page should be able to move there are no other proper articles for other songs titled "Good Together". -Yeehaw45 (talk) 14:46, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All but 1 of the other entries is a song so I'd move to the base name but there was apparently consensus against that due to the album so I'd probably support this and see what's done with the album before moving to the base name. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:53, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No.6 on the Canada Country chart? Seriously? Does this song justify an article? ...... the other songs on Good Together dab page by Honne and Shy Martin come up on YouTube and Google, James Barjer Band doesn't. While Good Together (album) gets hits in GBooks. Merge to James Barker Band album? In ictu oculi (talk)

Incidentally, the album (which got much higher page views than this song) was draftspaced and the restoration (per previous RM) was never done till just now, by me. It has greater long term significance than this song, more book hits, and higher page views. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:45, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure the most-played domestic song on Canadian country radio for 2018 which is also gold-certified does merit an article. If I search up “Good Together” on YouTube, the James Barker Band song is the first result. I get the same result on Google as well. I only proposed moving it to “Good Together (song)” this time too, to be clear. -Yeehaw45 (talk) 14:00, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose the different results are due to cookies. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:30, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support per WP:SONGDAB. 162 etc. (talk) 15:48, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.