Talk:Good Riddance (band)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Good Riddance (band) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Disambiguation
[edit]I don't think the punk rock band Good Riddance should get squatters rights to the name of this page. Since there are multiple uses for the phrase Good Riddance, this page should direct users to a disambiguation page where said users can decide which usage of the phrase they are seeking.
Currently there are 3 uses:
- Good Riddance (film)
- Good Riddance (Time of Your Life)
- Good Riddance, a punk rock band
Does anyone disagree with this?
(talk)Wallstreethotrod (talk) 11:42, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- The hat note is good enough. Good Riddance are not squatting. Read about naming conventions. Darrenhusted (talk) 12:46, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved as per WP:SNOW. Yeah, I participated, and yeah, this didn't last the full week, but at least now the move request is done. Good riddance. (non-admin closure) Red Slash 05:05, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Good Riddance → Good Riddance (band) – Based on Google and Google Books results, the band isn't a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. "Good Riddance (Time of Your Life) would seem to have a better claim, or even the phrase itself. And the band doesn't seem to have long-term significance beyond that of other topics. Consider that the song had over 10,000 views last month to the band's 3279. Some of the latter were surely looking for another topic. Keeping the band as primary is not supported by any accepted PRIMARYTOPIC criterion. BDD (talk) 04:59, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support displacing band suggest replacing it with a disambiguation page instead. -- 70.24.250.192 (talk) 07:22, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support good riddance (now a dab) is a common phrase, and when capitalized no primary topic. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:06, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support move and Retarget Good Riddance to Good riddance due to no primary topic being established. Steel1943 (talk) 19:07, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support and redirect to the dab as per everyone Red Slash 03:44, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support move and Retarget Good Riddance to Good riddance per Steel1943 walk victor falk talk 16:22, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Good Riddance (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061012065031/http://www.outlie.net/ to http://outlie.net/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:35, 1 January 2018 (UTC)