Talk:Golda Meir School

Wisconsin Mid‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph of Golda Meir School Upper Campus: 227 W. Pleasant St., Milwaukee, Wisconsin be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Wisconsin may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Photo

I don't want to be rude but the photo of Golda Meir School on the upper right corner is too ugly for this article, featureing a chimney, fire escape and garbage dumps. It is just not suitable for National Historic Landmark.

Akkie.. I plan to take a better frontal photo at some point. Please do not remove article photos just because you do not like them... the present image at least details points discussed in the article. The image you uploaded appears to be copyvio [1] and improperly licensed. Regards 72.131.44.247 18:26, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I made a point of going out and taking another photo of the building, with the garbage bin being less prominent in the frame. Fire escapes are part of the building and are found on both faces. The "front" of the school is obscured by trees and a terraced playground with fence, and is not as picturesque as one might imagine. I might try for that angle some day when I find myself in the area on a weekend (no school) before noon (sun). 72.131.44.247 05:17, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't interpret this as being rude. Even though the new photo looks better, it is still ugly. Trees are good for pictures. A builing without trees looks boring. I think a frontal photo is better. And you can take the photo at a higher place to make it look better. Akkie 15:39, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The photo depicts reality and allows readers to see the building with its architectural features. I'll try to take a photo from an angle you like more at some point, but I don't usually find myself driving around in the morning with a camera. You are welcome to add an additional whimsical image to the article (I never removed the one you had – merely added mine back), so long as it is properly licensed/attributed and conforms to Wikipedia's copyright policy. The image you uploaded fails these points and its fair use in the article is dubious. My personal observation is that it is a low-quality low-resolution gif whose transparencies are inconsistent with the background color used on the page. 72.131.44.247 20:25, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Gms.jpg

Image:Gms.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:03, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There was a nice photo that accompanied this article... it was taken specifically for Wikipedia, but a dick admin decided to delete it with out discussion. 184.58.245.87 (talk) 07:57, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I know it's years later, but if it's the photo @Maxpaul18: took, it was deleted on the rationale that no source was given. WhisperToMe (talk) 08:12, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

sourcing / refimprove / new informal info for article

A non-logged in user just added, apparently in good faith, some informal text without sourcing. A source is needed for any information, so it would be justified if another editor removed the added info. However, other paragraphs in the same section and elsewhere also do not have in-line citations. Adding in-line citations would improve the article; a guideline i have heard is that there should be one at the end of each paragraph, at least.

To the non-logged in user, thanks for contributing. But can you point us to a website URL or an offline document that can be used as the source for any/all of this information? Added info (which probably otherwise will be removed from article):

A fairly unknown jewish school in the Milwaukee district, this school has been around for a while. TIt is not as populated as the largest Jewish school in the Milwaukee area which is called the Milwaukee Jewish Day School (M.J.D.S.) The school isn't as populated as M.J.D.S., but it is a great alternative to M.J.D.S.
k 4&5- 25 people 1st grade- 16 people 2nd grade- 13 people 3rd grade- 18 people 4th grade- 21 people 5th grade- 28 people 6th grade- 24 people 7th grade- 21 people 8th grade- 18 people

These numbers are as up to date as August 17, 2008

Thanks! doncram (talk) 05:56, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Golda Meir School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090403223602/http://tps.cr.nps.gov:80/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=1883&ResourceType=Building to http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=1883&ResourceType=Building

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:01, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]