Talk:Gog (trilobite)

Arthropods Low‑importance

	Arthropods portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arthropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of arthropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArthropodsWikipedia:WikiProject ArthropodsTemplate:WikiProject ArthropodsArthropods articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Not monotypic[edit]

@Apokryltaros: As a note Gog isnt monotypic, it has two species Gog catillus and Gog yangtzeensis. @Peter coxhead: would you be able to move this back to Gog (trilobite)?.--Kev min § 04:35, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

goes to google the paper for the Chinese Gog*--Mr Fink (talk) 04:42, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gog yangtzeensis Lu, 1975 alt combination Niobe yangtzeensis Lu, 1975, Belongs to Gog according to Z. Zhou et al. 1998 (Z. Zhou, W. T. Dean, W. Yuan and T. Zhou. 1998. Ordovician trilobites from the Dawangou Formation, Kalpin, Xinjiang, north-west China. Palaeontology 41(4):693-735 pdf) per Fossilworks Gog yangtzeensis @Apokryltaros:.--Kev min § 04:59, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, no cephalon is currently known yet, unfortunately.--Mr Fink (talk) 05:13, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done and tidied up a bit (but not my area of expertise). Peter coxhead (talk) 14:42, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]