Talk:Gay

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gay article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7: 20 days

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Gay. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Gay at the Reference desk.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies

Men's Issues Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Men's Issues, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Men's Issues articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Men's IssuesWikipedia:WikiProject Men's IssuesTemplate:WikiProject Men's IssuesMen's Issues
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality Top‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

This topic contains controversial issues, some of which have reached a consensus for approach and neutrality, and some of which may be disputed. Before making any potentially controversial changes to the article, please carefully read the discussion-page dialogue to see if the issue has been raised before, and ensure that your edit meets all of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please also ensure you use an accurate and concise edit summary.

Regarding the pejorative use section ...

A lot of these sources seem out of date (the earliest ref is from 2006, and the latest 2013). Language has changed a lot since then, especially if we are talking about school- and college-aged people. As such, I have added tags indicating that these sections and mention in the lead need updating. -- QueenofBithynia (talk) 12:45, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On a slight tangent, I also think the quote from the BBC Board of Governors should be trimmed as the section is looking a bit like a WP:QUOTEFARM. But the issue of these sources being out-of-date is probably more of a problem. QueenofBithynia (talk) 12:52, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. The use of sources that are like 10 or more years old is pretty weird considering how much social change occured in the 2010s. I added the 2021 GLSEN National School Climate Survey towards the beginning of that section to better support that it is commonly used pejoratively. I may add more up to date sources when I have the time. Urchincrawler (talk) 09:06, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Added a source on the effects of pejorative use and a source on how emotional response varies depending on situation. The former is written in 2019, but I'm unsure if it resolves this issue as its data was collected in 2013. The later source is from 2021. Is this sufficient to remove the tags, or should they be kept up? Urchincrawler (talk) 06:39, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The definition of gay can mean something different

back in the day many people referred to gay as meaning happy and joyful and it means something way different today like for example "poloboy is gay" back in the day it would've been a compliment but now its referred to as a insult for some people TheEDog2000 (talk) 05:56, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The pejorative use of the word is discussed in the section Generalized pejorative use, and in the third paragraph of the lead. HiLo48 (talk) 06:13, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the History Section, it mentions "In English, the word's primary meaning was "joyful", "carefree", "bright and showy", and the word was very commonly used with this meaning in speech and literature." Is that the meaning you are referring to? Urchincrawler (talk) 22:16, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Gаy" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Gаy has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 15 § Gаy until a consensus is reached. Fram (talk) 09:41, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

History in Film

The 1938 film "Bringing Up Baby" was not the first use of the word in film. In the 1934 film "The Thin Man," starring William Powell and Myrna Loy, Powell bumps into and briefly embraces another man during a rather chaotic dance scene. As the other man exits, Powell comments, "I'm gay for this one," referring to the musical selection playing at the time. Jrwmd (talk) 16:25, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a source? DonIago (talk) 16:44, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking of sources the one attributing the use of the word gay in Bringing Up Baby to being coded language doesn't seem very reliable.

I've read a book (canned goods as caviar: American film comedy of the 1930's) which protests that it definitely wasn't coded language. Protests poorly admittedly - but it seems relevant to consider if the whole section on history in film doesn't need some better sources.

not OP but I'll try and find a source on the use in "The Thin Man" -- I've definitely seen it mentioned somewhere before in the context/ double meaning of the word gay. 131.170.239.13 (talk) 05:13, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 25 July 2024

–

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Gay is loving the girl and what the description for it is saying is boy on boy.!! 2601:2C1:9080:4180:B8B0:4452:4444:EA0E (talk) 02:48, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Left guide (talk) 02:51, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will never destroy what was made for love the right and even the thgirl ov two and even knowing what's really right and thgirl like I and you but never will they destroy the purpose for what I ever started too have love in and even forreal activities! 2601:2C1:9080:4180:B8B0:4452:4444:EA0E (talk) 06:26, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gay not LGBTQ

Can we have one subject to ourselves and not LGBTQ+ nonsense already??? 85.245.187.39 (talk) 15:39, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]