Talk:Gartner/Archives/2017
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Scientiology
Seems that there is a direct relationship between their models and scientiology behaviour modification programs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.88.226.115 (talk) 00:58, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Seems that you're lacking a reliable source. Niteshift36 (talk) 02:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Merge
I support the merge, we should do it or remove the tag. ♫ RichardWeiss talk contribs 13:45, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
I am confused by the tag as there is no talk page discussion about the merge. If we are talking about merging Ideas International into Gartner, I would fully support that. II appears defunct and can easily be incorporated into this page, leaving a redirect from the name. --CNMall41 (talk) 00:59, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- Which one is merging into the other? Niteshift36 (talk) 04:04, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- Have added mention of the acquisition of Ideas International, and clarified on that page that the company is now defunct (having been acquired). This should resolve the merge question. Including a lot of history about an acquired company pre-acquisition by Gartner would be out of place on this page.Cander0000 (talk) 23:55, 30 June 2017 (UTC)