Talk:Garfield and Friends

This article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	A response section needs to be added to this article, or the current one needs to be expanded. This section should be well cited using neutral and reliable sources that discuss the reaction of both critics and the viewing audience to the show. Additionally, document any impact the show has had on society, and merchandise that may have resulted from the show, such as toys, games, etc.

Animation: American / Television Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Comics: Strips / United States Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related work groups:
/
	This article is supported by Comic strips work group.
	This article is supported by United States comics work group.

United States: Animation / Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Animation portal This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. out of Orson's Farm!

Why are all of the U.S. Acre references changed to Orson's Farm references? The original title of those segments was U.S. Acres, and it should therefore stay that way. The fact that Orson's Farm was the name used in all markets outside North America is irrelevant; we should use the original title.

Indeed. Using the original title by no means makes the article North America-centric. I have done manual reversion of the title. --Sn0wflake 23:49, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It says that seasons 6 and 7 weren't shown in syndication. While I don't know about now, I am positive that many of those episodes at least used to be (oh, 8-10 years ago), as I recognize them, and didn't watch at least the last couple seasons in the original airing. Melodia Chaconne 23:01, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Would people please stop changing the "U.S. Acres" references to "Orson's Farm" references? That's the original title, and it should therefore read as "U.S. Acres".

Yes - second that notion. ~ Ross (ElCharismo) 14:15, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I asked to Mark Evainer via e-mail about why Arlene don't appear on the show but Penelope instead. I don't know how to add the answer to the article with a citation --Atoon 17:36, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wade's floatation tube expressions The article states that the duck head on Wade's floatation tube follows his expressions, but never his mouth movements. This is not true. In at least one episode (Fine Feathered Funny-man) Wade's toy duck head copies his mouth movements as well. [[1]] EthanL (talk) 08:30, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Boomerang

Did they remove it again? WAVY 10 15:02, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Panic Picnic

I think that this episode should be included here, as it's Garfield's most recognizable cartoon ever. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.169.80.120 (talk) 15:53, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

Hey, what was wrong with the old picture? 99.230.152.143 01:56, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What I'm refering to is that a new picture is being used in the infobox. 99.230.152.143 01:43, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rosalina

Guys, is this some inside joke I'm missing here? Rosalina doesn't exist. And if you have actual evidence of Rosalina's existence please supply references. Otherwise, you might confuse the poor souls who come here and think Rosalina exists.

And if you have an actual reputable source that says Rosalina exists and was deliberately edited out of syndication AND the DVD sets, please inform us. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.247.188.112 (talk) 06:37, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you mean Roselyn, then just watch The Great Getaway.

If you don't, then you might wanna check VHS tapes of the original CBS airings. 2602:30A:C010:11F0:4109:E2E4:557E:C7E (talk) 14:49, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Wanted: Wade

An article that you have been involved in editing, Wanted: Wade, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wanted: Wade. Thank you. – sgeureka ^t•c 12:40, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Story or Cartoon?

I just changed First Garfield Story to First Garfield Cartoon and the like (basically, I just changed mentions of story to cartoon in the section which describes the format.) I just felt cartoon was more appropriate. If anyone feels this is incorrect, revert it.67.180.128.232 (talk) 22:23, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DVD releases

If somebody can find the answer, could they add why all the references to U.S. Acres were changed to Orson's Farm on the DVD releases? I know that was the name used for foreign syndication, but AFAIK "U.S. Acres" was used both for CBS and the syndicated airings in the United States, so why do the Region 1 DVDs use the Orson's Farm name? The only use of the U.S. Acres name was one of the quickies on Volume 2 was called U.S. Acres Quickie, every other short and full length segment uses the Orson's Farm name. This seems odd, and something that could be mentioned in the article. 96.25.248.210 (talk) 02:00, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be getting sick of all the "Orson's Farms" around Volume 5, DIsc 2. 2602:30A:C010:11F0:4109:E2E4:557E:C7E (talk) 14:49, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nermal "androgynous?"

I can't believe I have to fight for this point, but describing Nermal as androgynous is as ridiculous as trying to describe Bert and Ernie as gay. It goes against the fact that Nermal has long been established as a male in both the comic strip and the cartoon(s). That a handful of people view him as androgynous is meaningless to and should not be a part of the article. 184.7.167.28 (talk) 15:51, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're exagerating a little bit. First, it's not much of a "fight", we both reverted once and stopped, and then started this discussion. Secondly, I'm not sure you quite understand the definition of androgyny. Read Androgyny. It merely means "referring to the combination of masculine and feminine characteristics" and "not fit cleanly into the typical masculine and feminine gender roles of their society". It's not like it'd be calling Nermal a transvestite or something, it's just saying he has masculine-like and feminine-like traits, which doesn't seem too out of line, considering how "cutesy" he looks/acts, how he was voiced by a female in the cartoons, etc. Sergecross73 msg me 17:35, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever your case, it's still opinion on his nature. Besides, he's ink and paint on celluloid, so determining androgyny is really a pointless and silly effort. 184.7.167.28 (talk) 21:57, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A huge majority of this article is unsourced opinions, descriptions, and original description (So overwhelmingly so that I've never been motivated enough to do a whole clean up of the article.) I'm not sure I understand your hang up on this minor detail, but it doesn't really matter either way... Sergecross73 msg me 22:01, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I find it interesting that you rejected someone else adding a description of Garfield that's actually from the comic strip while defending a description of Nermal that's nothing but an editor's invention. You don't see any contradiction in that? 184.7.167.28 (talk) 19:44, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read the whole comment? The emphasis wasn't that it was from the comic, but that the description's purpose ("meatball") was to be a punchline to a joke, not be an actual, helpful description for the character. Note how that is both the first, and more detailed, aspect mentioned in the edit summary. Sergecross73 msg me 19:56, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lenore

Why does the character Lenore keep on getting deleted. She was a REAL character in the U.S.Acres episode, "Stark Raven Mad". STOP deleting her unless someone have a valid reason WHY?: — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.124.163.104 (talk) 19:46, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a valid reason: The poor grammar in her description makes it unclear what her role in the show was. Here's another reason: The addition is unsourced. And a third reason: A rudimentary Google search on "'Garfield and Friends' Lenore" yields no reliable sources and instead returns a lot of fan-fiction. Until you can provide a source, Lenore will likely be removed. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:24, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you're talking about a very minor character, who was only in that episode and was merely part of a spoof of a certain Edgar Allen Poe story (hence the name Lenore). We don't need to have every single Garfield and Friends character listed, do we? GVO8891 (talk) 02:37, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

By far the most persuasive reason of all! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:31, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling and Grammar

I noticed that this article has some spelling and grammar errors. I made a sandbox that contains some corrections regarding spelling and error — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aamir.dawood (talk • contribs)

If you notice grammatical errors and typos, please fix them. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:23, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Garfield and Friends. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20051206022324/http://www.foxhome.com:80/garfield/ to http://www.foxhome.com/garfield

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:51, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Viacom

Viacom’s recent purchase of Garfield only gave them the Garfield IP. It didn’t give them access to everything Garfield (for example, the live action movies are in Disney’s hands). 9 Story still holds the distribution rights to this show and will continue to do so until whatever deal they had in place with Paws Inc. expires.--PinkiePie097 (talk) 01:21, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Running Time?

For a while, the show aired in an hour-long block on CBS, with only one intro and one set of closing credits. These were broken up into half-hour shows for syndication. Since Garfield's tag in the intro would sometimes reference things from the second half-hour but absent when broken apart (for example, the "It Must Be True" episode mentions Binky the Clown appearing, but he is not present in the half-hour edit), it's clear these were not simply two episodes stitched together. This should be mentioned in the article. Sm5574 (talk) 00:13, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]