Jump to content

Talk:Gansu mole

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

According to The University of Michigan’s Animal Diversity Web site (for example this page:

The Talpinae subfamily Scalopinae is synonymous with the term “New World moles and relatives” and consists of two tribes:

One of these is just the [star-nosed mole], which is North American and the only member of its tribe.

The other tribe is (amusingly to me) named the “Scalopini”, a word synonymous with the term “hairy-tailed moles”, and includes four sub-groups, three of which are exclusively North American, new-world moles.

But the forth one, though is Chinese! Specifically, “Gansu Moles!!!!” How can this be? There must be some mistake, I think. If not, something very anomalous and interesting is happening. Forget about calling this group “New Word” if it has Asian animals, what is a North American animal doing in the middle of China? 72.230.11.240 (talk) 04:33, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gansu mole. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:50, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]