Talk:Game Workers Unite

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Game Workers Unite article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find video game sources: "Game Workers Unite" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk

Game Workers Unite has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 15, 2020. (Reviewed version).

Organized Labour Mid‑importance

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Video games Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Carlton Wilborn (1 participant)
Cossacks (video games series) (2 participants)
Rat Race (video game) (7 participants)
Red Barrels (3 participants)
The Campaign Trail (Web Game) (24 participants)
Paper doll (video games) (6 participants)
TheoTown (10 participants; relisted)
Old Grandma Hardcore (6 participants; relisted)
WePlay AniMajor (2 participants; relisted)
Zero Hour (video game) (6 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Game Workers Unite/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 13:08, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

" Game Developers' Conference" no apostrophe according to our article.
" Its British chapter " lost the subject in the preceding sentence.
"within Independent " within the Independent...
"end unfair overtime" isn't "unfair" a point of view?
" tech industries " etc technology (encyclopedia).
Link Discord/Facebook first time.
"Their activists... ", "Their goal..." I thought in USEng there was quite a strict adherence to singular here, after all the organization known as "Game Workers Unite" is a singular entity, right?
Generally, yes, but my understanding is that it's fine when emphasizing the group as individuals, e.g., "their activists" makes them sound like mercenaries when the collective is really just composed of individuals czar 04:00, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"esports" link. To some this just looks like a typo.
I'd argue that it looks like a typo either way :) (I opposed that move) czar 04:00, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Should "game developers" be "game developers'"?
"a private game developers Facebook Group"? Nope, I think that's fine. czar 04:00, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
" at the Game Developers' Conference " again, ironically, no apostrophe here apparently.
"The results were a turning point ..." according to whom?
In the source: "GDC 2018 marks a significant turning point for the industry undercurrent of pro-union sentiment." I don't think this necessitates attribution or is controversial and the sentence has a direct citation czar 04:00, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"founded[4] and" move that more elegantly, and do we not know exactly when?
Not that I've seen in print. Probably because it's a collective and not (to my knowledge) formally incorporated? Stylistically, I prefer to keep the footnote as close to the cited text to preserve text–source integrity. czar 04:00, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"AFL–CIO" en-dash.
"based on his staff and fan supporters" based on his staff what?
What about Game Workers Unite Ireland?
I haven't seen any news coverage about this branch, so it appears minor at the moment. After digging, I found this article but don't see anything worth importing. czar 04:00, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's it for a quick first pass. On hold. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 16:39, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man, thanks for the review! I've responded above to anything I haven't addressed directly in prose. czar 04:00, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, happy with this so promoting. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 17:00, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]