Talk:Gagak Item/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 19:19, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On it. -- Khazar2 (talk) 19:19, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Made just one tweak; please feel free to revert if you disagree.

More:

" the H. Dumas' musical troupe Lief Java" -- seems like this should be either "H. Dumas' musical troupe" or "the H. Dumas musical troupe"?

You're right, done. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:33, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"was premiered" -- I'm never sure on this usage, but would it be better to say simply "Gagak Item premiered"?

Done. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:33, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	~~Tiny questions above.~~ Sources are largely not accessible (or in Dutch) but accepted in good faith.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Brief, but that's understandable for a lost film.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	Pass

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.